Generic Draft Event

[vitorpamplona]

Adds a private draft event kind for any other event type. Clients can search by supported kinds via the k tag

Read here

[arthurfranca]

It may be useful to require an one-letter tag set to an event id/address when it is a comment/reply/referrer draft or empty string when "root" draft, like ['r', '<referenced-event-id-or-address-or-empty-string>']. Then one can fetch the draft of a reply to a specifc note or fetch a root draft.

[vitorpamplona]

Good point, I have added anchor events. I don't think we can ask to have empty rs because this kind should work for non-kind1 events as well.

[staab]

I almost like this, but the e/a tags make me think that this should probably not be generic; drafts should be specified by kind number on a case-by-case basis, since you may want to search for something other than the anchor.

[vitorpamplona]

I almost like this, but the e/a tags make me think that this should probably not be generic; drafts should be specified by kind number on a case-by-case basis, since you may want to search for something other than the anchor.

People can add other tags to this event at will. These are just the basic ones. The k already filters out things a client can't parse anyway.

[jb55]

I was looking to have encrypted url attachments but I think I can just add these to the inner draft and remove them when posting. This works for me!

[vitorpamplona]

@mikedilger curious to hear your feedback from the Private Relay list section here. The idea is to have a list of relays to store events that only the author should see. A private outbox if you will.

[alexgleason]

I haven't looked too deeply yet. But I have a lot of these kind 31234 events being submitted to my relay. I wonder if it's creating an event for ever letter people type. 😂

[vitorpamplona]

I wonder if it's creating an event for ever letter people type

It is. The goal for this event is to be saving drafts as people type so that if apps crash they never lose anything. Amethyst sends a new version in 1 second after the user stops typing if there is a change to the event. Maybe this is the first real use of replaceables we have seen in Nostr.

[alexgleason]

@vitorpamplona I've been having problems with uptime. I haven't been able to narrow it down yet, but I imagine this draft event isn't helping.

I get huge bursts of draft events, presumably when people on Amethyst are typing:

Is it really sending on every keystroke? It's not even debounced? That seems like a performance problem for both relays and users of Amethyst. It would make more sense to wait 5 seconds until the user has stopped typing to publish the draft event to other relays.

[vitorpamplona]

It is denounced at every second. What's the chart saying? How many events are in that peak? I can't quite figure it out.

And what's the green line?

[bumi]

fyi: I also see a lot of those events in our NWC only rely (we reject those events)