Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typo in about/index.md AR #2062

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Fix typo in about/index.md AR #2062

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

celyes
Copy link
Contributor

@celyes celyes commented Feb 10, 2019

Fixed the term "blocking call" to "non-blocking call" in about/index.md:41
@Aissaoui-Ahmed @InterstellarClub

@ghost ghost requested a review from fhemberger February 11, 2019 00:17
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ server.listen(port, hostname, () => {
تأخذ النود جي اس موديل الاحداث (event model) ابعد قليلا فتمثل الحلقة التكرارية الخاصة بالاحداث ([event loop][]) كمكون اساسي في وقت التشغيل (runtime construct) وليس كمكتبة في انظمة أخرى، حيث ان هنالك دائما استدعاء متزامن (blocking call)
للبدء في حلقة الاحداث.
مبدئيا، يتم تحديد السلوك عبر دالة مستدعاة في بداية السكريبت في نهايتها
تقوم بتشغيل خادم (server) عبر استدعاءٍ غير متزامن (blocking call) مثل <span dir="ltr">`EventMachine::run()`</span>، ولكن في النود جي اس لا يوجد شيء من هذا القبيل.
تقوم بتشغيل خادم (server) عبر استدعاءٍ غير متزامن (non-blocking call) مثل <span dir="ltr">`EventMachine::run()`</span>، ولكن في النود جي اس لا يوجد شيء من هذا القبيل.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

blocking is correct here, see https://nodejs.org/en/about/:

Typically behavior is defined through callbacks at the beginning of a script and at the end starts a server through a blocking call like EventMachine::run(). In Node there is no such start-the-event-loop call.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, Corrected the mistake.
@fhemberger

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 11, 2019

@celyes:You don't need to close it if you had a force push and fixed it, this could be also merged if possible :)

@celyes
Copy link
Contributor Author

celyes commented Feb 11, 2019

@Maledong : thank you, but it's basically blank lines, so i don't think it deserves to be merged IMO.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants