You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm just wondering how many collaborators you need here?
There's no real answer to this other than "more" while contributions are growing. Collaborators help with the sizable review load as we continue to gain more contributions (and we're not even near where we were on iojs.org for localizations yet).
+1 to this. However, we need to be 100% sure they know the general rules - more specifically the merging/PR rules. In the past it's only been a few contributors added, and the older contributors were able to confirm over Issues. I'm sure you have opinions/thoughts on this, @mikeal?
Upside is that everybody knows what's going on, and there will be as few mistakes as possible.
Downside is that we have to put effort into it. That sounds extremely lazy, but it's the most simple way to describe it. We may not have enough/willing/able people to be able to onboard, and it will limit the rate at which we can accept new collaborators a lot.
@sup I would add you, but I'm not a team maintainer (just checked). @fhemberger@snostorm or @therebelrobot, as well as @mikeal and maybe a few other Org owners can add you. I'd say we've got the +1 for at least @sup, and if anyone else from the list above expresses interest soon, we can add them too.
@bnb Sorry, I've been quite busy lately, so I wasn't able to follow all the contributions which happened in the meantime. That's why I won't participate in the voting as well. Please just let me know who wants to become a contributor and got a +1, and I'll be happy to add them.
I am already a part of Docker and Build working groups, so I probably don't need to become a collaborator here as well. I would like to contribute with more Docker stuff to the website however.
Unfortunately, GitHub has changed their user role management. Only organization owners can send invitations for new members to join (I can only add existing org members to the website team).
@Fishrock123 You're listed as owner, can you please add the new members?
Activity
stevemao commentedon Nov 12, 2015
I have no objections. I'm just wondering how many collaborators you need here?
Sent from my iPhone
mikeal commentedon Nov 12, 2015
There's no real answer to this other than "more" while contributions are growing. Collaborators help with the sizable review load as we continue to gain more contributions (and we're not even near where we were on iojs.org for localizations yet).
bnb commentedon Nov 12, 2015
+1 to this. However, we need to be 100% sure they know the general rules - more specifically the merging/PR rules. In the past it's only been a few contributors added, and the older contributors were able to confirm over Issues. I'm sure you have opinions/thoughts on this, @mikeal?
evanlucas commentedon Nov 12, 2015
Do we want to go as far as having an onboarding?
bnb commentedon Nov 12, 2015
There's an upside and a downside to it.
Upside is that everybody knows what's going on, and there will be as few mistakes as possible.
Downside is that we have to put effort into it. That sounds extremely lazy, but it's the most simple way to describe it. We may not have enough/willing/able people to be able to onboard, and it will limit the rate at which we can accept new collaborators a lot.
anseljh commentedon Nov 12, 2015
I contributed exactly 2 bytes, so feel free to defer any onboarding or other work for me! 👍
bnb commentedon Nov 12, 2015
@sup Yes.
bnb commentedon Nov 12, 2015
@sup As well as GOVERNANCE.md
phillipj commentedon Nov 13, 2015
Nice @mikeal 👍
bnb commentedon Nov 16, 2015
@sup I would add you, but I'm not a team maintainer (just checked). @fhemberger @snostorm or @therebelrobot, as well as @mikeal and maybe a few other Org owners can add you. I'd say we've got the +1 for at least @sup, and if anyone else from the list above expresses interest soon, we can add them too.
matthewloring commentedon Nov 16, 2015
@bnb I would be happy to become a collaborator as well.
bnb commentedon Nov 17, 2015
@matthewloring Okay, just need another WG member to +1 you and you're set.
evanlucas commentedon Nov 17, 2015
I'm not a WG member, but +1 to @matthewloring
xcatliu commentedon Nov 17, 2015
@bnb I'm ready to contribute to the website with you 😀
fhemberger commentedon Nov 17, 2015
@bnb Sorry, I've been quite busy lately, so I wasn't able to follow all the contributions which happened in the meantime. That's why I won't participate in the voting as well. Please just let me know who wants to become a contributor and got a +1, and I'll be happy to add them.
kohei-takata commentedon Nov 17, 2015
@bnb I want to be a collaborator!
fhemberger commentedon Nov 17, 2015
@sup Just added you.
Starefossen commentedon Nov 17, 2015
I am already a part of Docker and Build working groups, so I probably don't need to become a collaborator here as well. I would like to contribute with more Docker stuff to the website however.
phillipj commentedon Jan 14, 2016
@fhemberger these three was mentioned and has expressed they want to be collaborators, could you add them aswell? ..and close the issue afterwards :)
@matthewloring @kohei-takata @xcatliu
fhemberger commentedon Jan 15, 2016
Unfortunately, GitHub has changed their user role management. Only organization owners can send invitations for new members to join (I can only add existing org members to the website team).
@Fishrock123 You're listed as owner, can you please add the new members?
Fishrock123 commentedon Jan 16, 2016
@fhemberger Invited all 3.
phillipj commentedon Jan 16, 2016
Closing this since the rest didn't respond.