Skip to content

Conversation

@sxa
Copy link
Member

@sxa sxa commented Dec 18, 2025

As documented in #61110 - these tests do not pass on most currently available RISC-V systems.

This matches the approach used for macos/x64 and Linux/ppc64le.

Signed-off-by: Stewart X Addison <sxa@ibm.com>
@sxa sxa self-assigned this Dec 18, 2025
@sxa sxa added the riscv64 Issues and PRs related to the riscv64 architecture. label Dec 18, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/single-executable

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels Dec 18, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.52%. Comparing base (4f24aff) to head (6d68db6).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #61111      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.53%   88.52%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         703      703              
  Lines      208546   208546              
  Branches    40217    40213       -4     
==========================================
- Hits       184634   184607      -27     
- Misses      15926    15948      +22     
- Partials     7986     7991       +5     

see 43 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. riscv64 Issues and PRs related to the riscv64 architecture. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants