module: correctly detect top-level await in ambiguous contexts

[islandryu]

Fixes: #58331

Many syntax errors are incorrectly treated as requiring ESM recompilation, but since they can't be clearly distinguished from top-level await-related errors, the current fix ends up handling them together.

From what I can tell by looking at the issues reported on V8, this appears to be a problem on the V8 side, so I will see if a fix can be made there.
https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40070895#comment1

That said, this patch will be necessary until the issue is resolved in V8.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.11%. Comparing base (4d5ee24) to head (993bcfc).
Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #58646      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.10%   90.11%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         640      640              
  Lines      188493   188431      -62     
  Branches    36971    36965       -6     
==========================================
- Hits       169843   169808      -35     
+ Misses      11358    11342      -16     
+ Partials     7292     7281      -11     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/node_contextify.cc	81.30% <100.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️

... and 31 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[nodejs-github-bot]

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/67387/

[nodejs-github-bot]

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/67585/

[jasnell]

Did the linter/formatter format the code this way?

[islandryu]

Yes, but now that you mention it, it's a weird format.
I've changed the comment's position.

[islandryu]

@jasnell
Could you take another look when you have a moment?

[joyeecheung]

Can you add some tests to ensure that unrelated errors stays the same? For example, when it's const foo bar (which is supposed to throw SyntaxError: Unexpected identifier 'bar') or console.log('PI: ' Math.PI); (which is supposed throw missing ) after argument list).

[islandryu]

I added several tests to confirm that unrelated errors are not affected by top-level await.