Skip to content

Conversation

aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

@aduh95 aduh95 commented Oct 4, 2024

Backport of #54853 and #55318

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/crypto
  • @nodejs/http
  • @nodejs/http2
  • @nodejs/net
  • @nodejs/streams
  • @nodejs/test_runner

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. v20.x Issues that can be reproduced on v20.x or PRs targeting the v20.x-staging branch. labels Oct 4, 2024
@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Oct 4, 2024

I take the opportunity to ask: how is it that when applied to v22.x-staging, cdae315 fails (because SymbolAsyncDispose is no longer in primordials per the change being backported here), while on main it's perfectly fine?
CleanShot 2024-10-04 at 19 25 09

SymbolAsyncDispose,
Uint8Array,
} = primordials;

@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor Author

aduh95 commented Oct 4, 2024

I'm not sure, I guess the test doesn't cover that method, or it's being inherited from somewhere else 🤔

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Oct 5, 2024

I've checked and primordials.SymbolAsyncDispose exists on main.

Opened #55276

Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@marco-ippolito marco-ippolito added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Nov 16, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Nov 16, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

PR-URL: nodejs#54853
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@aduh95 aduh95 force-pushed the symbol-async-dispose branch from 8c960bc to d6d91f2 Compare November 16, 2024 11:06
PR-URL: nodejs#55318
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

marco-ippolito pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2024
PR-URL: #54853
Backport-PR-URL: #55264
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
marco-ippolito pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2024
PR-URL: #55318
Backport-PR-URL: #55264
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
@marco-ippolito
Copy link
Member

Landed in f25a5b6...0b3fb34

@aduh95 aduh95 deleted the symbol-async-dispose branch November 18, 2024 09:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. v20.x Issues that can be reproduced on v20.x or PRs targeting the v20.x-staging branch.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants