Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: remove incorrect debug() in test-policy-integrity #34961

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2020

Conversation

Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Aug 28, 2020

The instructions to use test:policy-integrity:NUMBER do not work, I'm
afraid. This removes them.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@Trott Trott requested a review from bmeck August 28, 2020 21:56
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Aug 28, 2020
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Aug 28, 2020

/ping @bmeck, just in case I got it wrong here, but I don't think I did?

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Aug 28, 2020

@Trott Trott added the review wanted PRs that need reviews. label Aug 30, 2020
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Sep 1, 2020

@nodejs/collaborators This could use some reviews.

Copy link
Contributor

@ryzokuken ryzokuken left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

@puzpuzpuz puzpuzpuz self-requested a review September 1, 2020 06:49
@Trott Trott added request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. and removed review wanted PRs that need reviews. labels Sep 1, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 1, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@richardlau
Copy link
Member

Commit subsystem should be "test" instead of "doc".

@Trott Trott changed the title doc: remove incorrect debug() in test-policy-integrity test: remove incorrect debug() in test-policy-integrity Sep 1, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Sep 2, 2020

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

The instructions to use `test:policy-integrity:NUMBER` do not work, I'm
afraid. This removes them.

PR-URL: nodejs#34961
Reviewed-By: Ujjwal Sharma <ryzokuken@disroot.org>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Andrey Pechkurov <apechkurov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Zeyu Yang <himself65@outlook.com>
Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <bradley.meck@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
@Trott Trott merged commit 4f7440c into nodejs:master Sep 2, 2020
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Sep 2, 2020

Landed in 4f7440c

@Trott Trott deleted the policy-integrity branch September 2, 2020 13:56
richardlau pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2020
The instructions to use `test:policy-integrity:NUMBER` do not work, I'm
afraid. This removes them.

PR-URL: #34961
Reviewed-By: Ujjwal Sharma <ryzokuken@disroot.org>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Andrey Pechkurov <apechkurov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Zeyu Yang <himself65@outlook.com>
Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <bradley.meck@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
@richardlau richardlau mentioned this pull request Sep 2, 2020
4 tasks
richardlau pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2020
The instructions to use `test:policy-integrity:NUMBER` do not work, I'm
afraid. This removes them.

PR-URL: #34961
Reviewed-By: Ujjwal Sharma <ryzokuken@disroot.org>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Andrey Pechkurov <apechkurov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Zeyu Yang <himself65@outlook.com>
Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <bradley.meck@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2020
The instructions to use `test:policy-integrity:NUMBER` do not work, I'm
afraid. This removes them.

PR-URL: #34961
Reviewed-By: Ujjwal Sharma <ryzokuken@disroot.org>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Andrey Pechkurov <apechkurov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Zeyu Yang <himself65@outlook.com>
Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <bradley.meck@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2020
The instructions to use `test:policy-integrity:NUMBER` do not work, I'm
afraid. This removes them.

PR-URL: #34961
Reviewed-By: Ujjwal Sharma <ryzokuken@disroot.org>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Andrey Pechkurov <apechkurov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Zeyu Yang <himself65@outlook.com>
Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <bradley.meck@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Sep 28, 2020
joesepi pushed a commit to joesepi/node that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2021
The instructions to use `test:policy-integrity:NUMBER` do not work, I'm
afraid. This removes them.

PR-URL: nodejs#34961
Reviewed-By: Ujjwal Sharma <ryzokuken@disroot.org>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Andrey Pechkurov <apechkurov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Zeyu Yang <himself65@outlook.com>
Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <bradley.meck@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants