Skip to content

Conversation

@Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Oct 16, 2019

common.skipIfInspectorEnabled() is only used once in all of the tests.
The test is more clear (in my opinion, at least) without the abstraction
so put the check directly in the test. Additionally, it honestly looks
like an error (which is how I noticed it in the first place) and that
someone mistyped the far more common skipIfInspectorDisabled().

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Oct 16, 2019
@Trott Trott changed the title test: remove common.skipIfInspectorDisabled() test: remove common.skipIfInspectorEnabled() Oct 16, 2019
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@Trott Trott added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Oct 16, 2019
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Oct 18, 2019

Landed in fa2ba05

@Trott Trott closed this Oct 18, 2019
@Trott Trott merged commit fa2ba05 into nodejs:master Oct 18, 2019
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2019
common.skipIfInspectorEnabled() is only used once in all of the tests.
The test is more clear (in my opinion, at least) without the abstraction
so put the check directly in the test. Additionally, it honestly looks
like an error (which is how I noticed it in the first place) and that
someone mistyped the far more common skipIfInspectorDisabled().

PR-URL: #29993
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2019
common.skipIfInspectorEnabled() is only used once in all of the tests.
The test is more clear (in my opinion, at least) without the abstraction
so put the check directly in the test. Additionally, it honestly looks
like an error (which is how I noticed it in the first place) and that
someone mistyped the far more common skipIfInspectorDisabled().

PR-URL: #29993
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Oct 23, 2019
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2019
common.skipIfInspectorEnabled() is only used once in all of the tests.
The test is more clear (in my opinion, at least) without the abstraction
so put the check directly in the test. Additionally, it honestly looks
like an error (which is how I noticed it in the first place) and that
someone mistyped the far more common skipIfInspectorDisabled().

PR-URL: #29993
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2019
common.skipIfInspectorEnabled() is only used once in all of the tests.
The test is more clear (in my opinion, at least) without the abstraction
so put the check directly in the test. Additionally, it honestly looks
like an error (which is how I noticed it in the first place) and that
someone mistyped the far more common skipIfInspectorDisabled().

PR-URL: #29993
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
@Trott Trott deleted the skip-the-skip branch January 13, 2022 22:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants