Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: correct ABI entry for electron v4.0.4 #27394

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jacobq
Copy link
Contributor

@jacobq jacobq commented Apr 24, 2019

abi_version_registry.json incorrectly specified that electron v4.0.4 used NODE_MODULE_VERSION 64, but in fact it uses 69.

See:

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

`abi_version_registry.json` incorrectly specified that electron v4.0.4 used `NODE_MODULE_VERSION` 64, but in fact it uses 69.

See:

* electron/electron#16687
* https://github.com/electron/electron/releases/tag/v4.0.4
* electron/node-abi@9e4c1a6
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label Apr 24, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@MylesBorins MylesBorins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@jacobq
Copy link
Contributor Author

jacobq commented May 3, 2019

Looks like a test is failing because of the way I formatted my commit message. I enabled the "Allow edits from maintainers" option. Could someone revise it and rebase/amend? Otherwise let me know what I should've written instead (not sure what the subsystems are nor which one would be most appropriate here).

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

addaleax commented May 3, 2019

@jacobq You can ignore the commit message complaint – providing a commit message formatted according to our rules is the responsibility of the person who lands this, not the author’s. I’ll resume CI to get rid of the other failures.

@addaleax addaleax added addons Issues and PRs related to native addons. author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. labels May 3, 2019
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Copy link
Member

@mhdawson mhdawson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

Sorry it took so long!

Landed in 4a7b8ea 🎉

@addaleax addaleax closed this May 19, 2019
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2019
`abi_version_registry.json` incorrectly specified that electron v4.0.4
used `NODE_MODULE_VERSION` 64, but in fact it uses 69.

See:

* electron/electron#16687
* https://github.com/electron/electron/releases/tag/v4.0.4
* electron/node-abi@9e4c1a6

PR-URL: #27394
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2019
`abi_version_registry.json` incorrectly specified that electron v4.0.4
used `NODE_MODULE_VERSION` 64, but in fact it uses 69.

See:

* electron/electron#16687
* https://github.com/electron/electron/releases/tag/v4.0.4
* electron/node-abi@9e4c1a6

PR-URL: #27394
Reviewed-By: Myles Borins <myles.borins@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
@BridgeAR BridgeAR mentioned this pull request May 21, 2019
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
addons Issues and PRs related to native addons. author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants