Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: adding history regression test case #24843

Closed

Conversation

antsmartian
Copy link
Contributor

@antsmartian antsmartian commented Dec 5, 2018

Recently added mulitline caused a issue in history navigation ref: #24385

Fundamentally, we don't had a test case for navigation till now, the one I see here: https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/test/parallel/test-repl-persistent-history.js#L97, just tests one level navigation.

cc @nodejs/repl @BridgeAR

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@antsmartian sadly an error occured when I tried to trigger a build :(

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Dec 5, 2018
@antsmartian
Copy link
Contributor Author

@antsmartian
Copy link
Contributor Author

@antsmartian
Copy link
Contributor Author

@BridgeAR ping...

@antsmartian
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nodejs/repl @BridgeAR Gentle remainder 🔉

},
{
env: {},
test: [UP, UP, UP, DOWN, DOWN, DOWN],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suggest to add one more UP and one more DOWN so we reach the end of the list in both cases.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, taken care of this. Guess should be good now.. cc @BridgeAR

@antsmartian
Copy link
Contributor Author

@antsmartian
Copy link
Contributor Author

@BridgeAR Can you please just have a look now, have addressed your comments and I wanted to take your review once before I land this to master.

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

Still LG but please run a regular CI

@antsmartian
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah sure, thanks much @BridgeAR.

@antsmartian
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Dec 15, 2018

Landed in 0bf7d41

@Trott Trott closed this Dec 15, 2018
Trott pushed a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2018
PR-URL: nodejs#24843
Refs: nodejs#24385
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
@antsmartian
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @Trott

@antsmartian antsmartian deleted the repl-history-test-case branch December 15, 2018 10:55
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2018
PR-URL: #24843
Refs: #24385
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
@BethGriggs BethGriggs mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2018
sagitsofan pushed a commit to sagitsofan/node that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2018
PR-URL: nodejs#24843
Refs: nodejs#24385
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
refack pushed a commit to refack/node that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2019
PR-URL: nodejs#24843
Refs: nodejs#24385
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2019
PR-URL: #24843
Refs: #24385
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
@BethGriggs BethGriggs mentioned this pull request Feb 12, 2019
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2019
PR-URL: #24843
Refs: #24385
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2019
PR-URL: #24843
Refs: #24385
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants