-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: add a missing (flag param) scenario in test-fs-write-file-sync #24766
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
richardlau
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2018
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Commit title has a typo (scenraio
->scenario
).
fs.writeFileSync takes flag param to define the file opening semantics. Add a scenario that covers flags as well.
gireeshpunathil
force-pushed
the
fsflag
branch
from
December 1, 2018 07:41
8b5d580
to
b4ac19e
Compare
@richardlau - fixed, thanks. |
antsmartian
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2018
Trott
added
the
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
label
Dec 1, 2018
lpinca
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2018
BridgeAR
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2018
cjihrig
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2018
Trott
pushed a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2018
fs.writeFileSync takes flag param to define the file opening semantics. Add a scenario that covers flags as well. PR-URL: nodejs#24766 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Landed in 02cd706 |
BridgeAR
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2018
fs.writeFileSync takes flag param to define the file opening semantics. Add a scenario that covers flags as well. PR-URL: #24766 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
This was referenced Dec 7, 2018
refack
pushed a commit
to refack/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2019
fs.writeFileSync takes flag param to define the file opening semantics. Add a scenario that covers flags as well. PR-URL: nodejs#24766 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2019
fs.writeFileSync takes flag param to define the file opening semantics. Add a scenario that covers flags as well. PR-URL: #24766 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Merged
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2019
fs.writeFileSync takes flag param to define the file opening semantics. Add a scenario that covers flags as well. PR-URL: #24766 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2019
fs.writeFileSync takes flag param to define the file opening semantics. Add a scenario that covers flags as well. PR-URL: #24766 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
test
Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
(came across this while working on some thing).
fs.writeFileSync
takes flag param to define the file opening semantics. Add a scenario that covers flags as well.Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes