Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: added TC meeting minutes 2014-12-30 #229

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
96 changes: 96 additions & 0 deletions doc/tc-meetings/2014-12-30.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
# io.js TC Meeting 2014-12-30

## Links

* **Google Hangouts Video**: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O60sOsesjOo
* **GitHub Issue**: https://github.com/iojs/io.js/issues/211
* **Original Minutes Google Doc**: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KLfX2MZQbVSIaD2lBVqOFK0Kap4uFz9cTGihnpTuvPE

## Agenda

Extracted from https://github.com/iojs/io.js/labels/tc-agenda prior to meeting.

* sys: Remove after 3 years of deprecation #182 https://github.com/iojs/io.js/pull/182
* module: force require('process') to return a reference to process #206 https://github.com/iojs/io.js/pull/206
* File copyright policy #216 https://github.com/iojs/io.js/pull/216
* Rename v0.12 to v1.0.0 https://github.com/iojs/io.js/issues/218
* Merge strategy (v0.10 and joyent/node)

## Minutes

### Present

* Rod (build, facilitator)
* Ben (TC)
* Bert (TC)
* Chris (TC)
* Fedor (TC)
* Trevor (TC)

### sys: Remove after 3 years of deprecation #182

https://github.com/iojs/io.js/pull/182

* Ben: what sort of strategy to take? Deprecated only in the docs but no warning. Looking for an official deprecation policy.
* Bert: suggest we could properly deprecate but not a good case for removing it completely, Chris agreed
* Fedor: suggested a policy that removal of deprecated features should be done where there is a maintenance overhead, but otherwise if there is little/no cost then "who cares"
* Discussed a deprecation message on `require(‘sys’)`
* Ben: -0
* Fedor: +1
* Chris: +1
* Trevor: -0
* Bert: +1
* No disagreement to adding a deprecation message, **ask initial PR submitter to change to just adding a message**

### module: force require('process') to return a reference to process #206

https://github.com/iojs/io.js/pull/206

* #157 has a long discussion on this: https://github.com/iojs/io.js/issues/157
* Chris: +1 on a PR adding this
* Trevor: it just returns a global, no point
* Bert: not the way that JS adds new features; discussed the new Intl addition to joyent/node, in favor of making more things requirable rather than adding new globals all the time
* Tangential discussion on the Intl object being added in joyent/node
* Collected votes:
* Bert: +0
* Ben: +0.5
* Trevor: -0
* Fedor: +1
* Chris: +1
* **Ben to handle the merge / resolution**


### File copyright policy #216

https://github.com/iojs/io.js/pull/216

* Rod asked if there are any strong opinions about how to handle this
* **Group agreed that Rod will take this issue and seek legal advice to find a way forward**

### Rename v0.12 to v1.0.0

https://github.com/iojs/io.js/issues/218

* Trevor: concerns about 1.0 vs 1.x branch naming with maintaining semver releases while also doing LTS, 1.x effectively becomes master until a 2.0 comes along.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Extra blank line. I don't think it's worth holding this up though.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just ammend it on pull haha

* Bert: -1
* Ben: +1
* Chris: +1
* Fedor: +1
* Trevor: 0

Action: **Rename to "v1.x", Ben agreed to make the change**


### Merge strategy (v0.10 and joyent/node)

* _Much_ discussion about merge strategies, patches, branches, etc.
* Agreed to merge regularly
* **Bert agreed to monitor the situation and propose a merge strategy when the time is right**

### Next meeting

* Agreed to meet again on the 7th of January UTC
* Agreed to have mini-stand-up at the beginning of each meeting