Skip to content

Increased memory usage in nodejs version 20.16.0 due to fetch() #54274

Description

@BridgeAR

Discussed in https://github.com/orgs/nodejs/discussions/54248

Originally posted by SteffenHo August 7, 2024
We saw a massive increase in memory in our next.js application after updating to version 20.16.0. We build our application with docker and the 20-alpine image. Other users were also able to confirm this problem: https://www.reddit.com/r/node/comments/1ejzn64/sudden_inexplicable_memory_leak_on_new_builds/

image

We then switched to version 20.15.1 and the memory returned to normal.

Maybe someone else could confirm this problem too?

@ronag could you have a look into this?

Activity

  1. added
    memoryIssues and PRs related to Node.js memory management or memory footprint.
    on Aug 8, 2024
  2. avivkeller commented on Aug 8, 2024

    @avivkeller
    Member

    FWIW @snyamathi believes that this is caused by nodejs/undici@63b7794

    CC @nodejs/undici

  3. trivikr commented on Aug 8, 2024

    @trivikr
    Member

    Possible fix in nodejs/undici#3445

  4. ronag commented on Aug 9, 2024

    @ronag
    Member

    @mcollina @Uzlopak seems related to fetch and finalization.

  5. added
    fetchIssues and PRs related to the Fetch API.
    on Aug 9, 2024
  6. mcollina commented on Aug 9, 2024

    @mcollina
    SponsorMember

    First, a memory leak happens when the memory is never released. In the diagram above, the gc is at work in claiming/releasing all the memory. Therefore, this bug is not a memory leak, but a less panicking "increased memory usage" bug.

    Second, I would really love to see a reproduction that is not using Next.js, because it monkey-patches fetch()... which might interact badly with the "fire and forget" logic of undici (we need to support fetches that do not consume the request).

  7. changed the title [-]Memory Leak in nodejs version 20.16.0[/-] [+]Increased memory usage in nodejs version 20.16.0 due to fetch()[/+] on Aug 9, 2024
  8. mcollina commented on Aug 9, 2024

    @mcollina
    SponsorMember

    I've done a bit of research on this problem, and I came to these conclusions:

    Something in the latest undici releases increased memory consumption for the Next.js cache. This does not affect vanilla fetch() users.

    We need a reproduction without Next.js or React.cache() that clearly shows the problem. I couldn't isolate it myself, and I've exhausted the time I could dedicate so far.

    I've been trying to follow what their patching does, but I were not able to identify the problem.

  9. mcollina commented on Aug 9, 2024

    @mcollina
    SponsorMember

    #54286 contains the patched version of undici.

  10. avivkeller commented on Aug 10, 2024

    @avivkeller
    Member

    #54286 contains the patched version of undici.

    That PR has landed, so I've closed this issue. Feel free to reopen if you disagree.

  11. mistval commented on Aug 14, 2024

    @mistval

    I am encountering this with an Express app (not Next.js) and it appears to be an actual leak in my case. The heap grows until the process crashes with FATAL ERROR: Ineffective mark-compacts near heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory. It crashes eventually even with --max-old-space-size=1000, while on Node 20.15.1, it remains stable permanently with --max-old-space-size=50.

    I'll try distilling to a minimal repro case, it sounds like that could still be useful? Or are we likely all set with that PR?

  12. mcollina commented on Aug 14, 2024

    @mcollina
    SponsorMember

    Open a new issue, this case is very specific to Next.js, so it'll likely be something else.

  13. kouhin commented on Aug 27, 2024

    @kouhin

    We encountered this bug and confirmed that it still exists in 20.17.
    If you run into this issue, please use 20.15.1 temporarily. Upgrading to latest nodejs v22 might also help

  14. snyamathi commented on Aug 27, 2024

    @snyamathi

    @kouhin the fix landed in undici v6.19.6 and Node 20.17 still uses undici v6.19.2

    nodejs/undici@v6.19.5...v6.19.6

    https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/v20.17.0/src/undici_version.h#L5


    edit: I've opened a PR to backport the fix to Node v20 #54583

  15. 2 remaining items

  16. mcollina commented on Aug 27, 2024

    @mcollina
    SponsorMember

    reopening to track until this ships in v20.

  17. mrtimp commented on Aug 28, 2024

    @mrtimp

    @mcollina we are on v20, is there a suggested workaround rather than going to v22 or waiting for the next release or do we downgrade to 20.15.1 and use --max-old-space-size?

  18. mrtimp commented on Aug 29, 2024

    @mrtimp

    After reverting to 20.15.1 we now have a more stable memory utilisation (AWS ECS Fargate):

    screenshot_ms_832
  19. avivkeller commented on Aug 29, 2024

    @avivkeller
    Member

    @mcollina we are on v20, is there a suggested workaround rather than going to v22 or waiting for the next release or do we downgrade to 20.15.1 and use --max-old-space-size?

    You can always download the latest undici from npm and use that?

  20. mrtimp commented on Aug 29, 2024

    @mrtimp

    @redyetidev we tried that however it didn’t work for us

  21. avivkeller commented on Aug 29, 2024

    @avivkeller
    Member

    You may be experiencing a different issue, if so, please open in issue in nodejs/help or nodejs/undici

  22. snyamathi commented on Aug 29, 2024

    @snyamathi

    This is getting off topic for this issue, but the global fetch (https://nodejs.org/dist/latest-v20.x/docs/api/globals.html#fetch) which comes with node itself is different than adding a dependency on the npm package undici

    In theory, you could patch the global fetch with the npm package, though in practice you're probably better off just sticking to a version before this issue was present (eg 20.15.1) or after the patch is backported (TBD).

    The reason you don't want to patch fetch is because (assuming you're using it) both Next.JS AND React separately patch the global fetch function which may cause issues if done out of order. You could get around this by preloading the patch at startup, but why complicate things. Just downgrade or wait 😄

  23. edoardo-liotta commented on Aug 30, 2024

    @edoardo-liotta

    Adding up, had to downgrade to 20.15.1 to fix the leak on my project with Next.js (v14.2.5 - this didn't change).
    Will probably stick to node 20.15.1 as 20.17 LTS causes the leak.

    @redyetidev downloading undici would do the trick at the cost of having yet another dependency (and we should remind to remove it sooner or later when we'll upgrade node).

  24. Fonger commented on Sep 24, 2024

    @Fonger

    Any ETA on this get back port to v20?

  25. jnm733 commented on Oct 3, 2024

    @jnm733

    I have the same problem with Next.js and Node v20.16 and v20.17

    image (1)

  26. linked a pull request that will close this issuev20.18.0 release proposal #55170on Oct 3, 2024
  27. mcollina commented on Oct 4, 2024

    @mcollina
    SponsorMember

    The fix shipped in Node.js v20.18.0

  28. YutaMoriJP commented on Nov 19, 2024

    @YutaMoriJP

    Does anyone know if this also affected node v20.11.1? We're seeing a potential memory leak in next v14.2.7 with the pages router, but it's not as obvious with next v13.5.6, so I'm struggling to find the real issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    fetchIssues and PRs related to the Fetch API.memoryIssues and PRs related to Node.js memory management or memory footprint.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions