governance: add new collaborators #X

[Trott]

Continued discussion from #3761.

Names that have come up so far this round:

• @a0viedo commits, issue comments
• @AndreasMadsen commits, issue comments
• @fansworld-claudio commits, issue comments
• @feross commits, issue comments
• @iwuzhere commits, issue comments
• @jas commits, issue comments
• @jhamhader commits, issue comments
• @john-yan commits, issue comments
• @jwueller commits, issue comments
• @kapouer commits, issue comments
• @matthewloring commits, issue comments
• @obastemur commits, issue comments
• @phillipj commits, issue comments
• @pmq20 commits, issue comments
• @ronkorving commits, issue comments
• @santigimeno commits, issue comments
• @skomski commits, issue comments
• @stefanmb commits, issue comments
• @tflanagan commits, issue comments
• @thekemkid commits, issue comments
• @tomgco commits, [issue comments](https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues?page=1&q=commenter%3Atomgco &utf8=%E2%9C%93)
• @whitlockjc commits, issue comments

[evanlucas]

I'd like make sure @matthewloring (commits, issue comments) is nominated too.

[cjihrig]

There are a number of other people in #3761 who aren't listed here. I'll make a list.

[Fishrock123]

I suggest we use this format from past threads:

- @{NAME} [commits](https://github.com/nodejs/node/commits/master?author={NAME}), [issue comments](https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues?page=1&q=commenter%3A{NAME}&utf8=%E2%9C%93)

This gives any of us a quick overview of their activity.

[Trott]

@Fishrock123 I've edited the issue description to use that format. Thanks.

[GlenTiki]

@Trott I'm awaiting processing too :)

[cjihrig]

@thekemkid I'm updating the list and have your name.

[GlenTiki]

@cjihrig Cool. So for new readers worried that their name isn't there, don't spam? :)

[cjihrig]

OK, I updated the original list.

[Trott]

Recent-ish commit activity should not be the only metric we look at of course. (Just stating the obvious for the benefit of outside observers.) But it seems to me that it's far from a useless metric. So here's a list:

• based on commits landed since Nov 1 2015

• omitting current collaborators

• sorted by number of commits

• at least two commits in the time frame

  35 Tristian Flanagan tflanagan@datacollaborative.com
  15 Santiago Gimeno santiago.gimeno@gmail.com
  14 Stefan Budeanu stefan@budeanu.com
  8 Bryan English bryan@bryanenglish.com
  7 Jackson Tian shyvo1987@gmail.com
  6 Yazhong Liu yorkiefixer@gmail.com
  6 Claudio Rodriguez cjrodr@yahoo.com
  6 Alexander Makarenko estliberitas@gmail.com
  5 Matt Loring mattloring@google.com
  5 Tom Gallacher tomgallacher23@gmail.com
  4 Dave dave@jut.io
  4 Robert Jefe Lindstaedt robert.lindstaedt@gmail.com
  4 Timothy Gu timothygu99@gmail.com
  3 Benjamin Gruenbaum inglor@gmail.com
  3 Michael Cornacchia cornacch@ca.ibm.com
  3 Jonathan Persson persson.jonathan@gmail.com
  3 Adam Langley agl@google.com
  3 Carl Lei xecycle@gmail.com
  3 Jan Schär jscissr@gmail.com
  2 Devin Nakamura devinn@ca.ibm.com
  2 Andres Suarez zertosh@gmail.com
  2 Prayag Verma prayag.verma@gmail.com
  2 Kári Tristan Helgason kthelgason@gmail.com
  2 Richard Lau riclau@uk.ibm.com
  2 Richard Sun rsun@media.ucla.edu
  2 Imran Iqbal imrani@ca.ibm.com
  2 Ryan Sobol contact@ryansobol.com
  2 Sequoia McDowell sequoia.mcdowell@gmail.com
  2 Feross Aboukhadijeh feross@feross.org
  2 Mudit Ameta zeusdeux@gmail.com
  2 Ben Ripkens bripkens.dev@gmail.com
  2 zoubin zoubin04@gmail.com

[estliberitas]

Wow, I must do more useful contribs to get into org. Good motivation.

[jbergstroem]

@Trott how about getting the number of commits and comments into the first message? I reckon activity is is a good way to show engagement.

[pmq20]

Thanks for nominating. Though recently being absent due to work, I'd be contributing more if I was officially on board.

[whitlockjc]

PRs wouldn't be bad as well if we're looking for total work.