Skip to content

Ada's license #47894

Closed
Closed
@RaisinTen

Description

@RaisinTen

Ada had 2 license files - LICENSE-APACHE and LICENSE-MIT from the initial commit but when Ada was added to Node.js in #46410, only the MIT license of Ada was added to the Node.js' LICENSE file. Is this intentional or should we also add Ada's Apache license to the Node.js license?

Also, the license section on Ada's readme, which was added in ada-url/ada#328, says:

License

This code is made available under the Apache License 2.0 as well as the MIT license. For unicode processing, we rely on a few functions from UniLib which are licensed under the Mozilla Public License v.2.0.

Our tests include third-party code and data. The benchmarking code includes third-party code: it is provided for research purposes only and not part of the library.

So should we also include a copy of Mozilla Public License Version 2.0?

cc @anonrig @lemire

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    dependenciesPull requests that update a dependency file.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions