Description
Ada had 2 license files - LICENSE-APACHE
and LICENSE-MIT
from the initial commit but when Ada was added to Node.js in #46410, only the MIT license of Ada was added to the Node.js' LICENSE
file. Is this intentional or should we also add Ada's Apache license to the Node.js license?
Also, the license section on Ada's readme, which was added in ada-url/ada#328, says:
License
This code is made available under the Apache License 2.0 as well as the MIT license. For unicode processing, we rely on a few functions from UniLib which are licensed under the Mozilla Public License v.2.0.
Our tests include third-party code and data. The benchmarking code includes third-party code: it is provided for research purposes only and not part of the library.
So should we also include a copy of Mozilla Public License Version 2.0?