Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Repository Tagline #1714

Closed
jasnell opened this issue May 16, 2015 · 40 comments
Closed

Update Repository Tagline #1714

jasnell opened this issue May 16, 2015 · 40 comments
Labels
doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations.

Comments

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented May 16, 2015

The io.js repository tagline currently says, "A friendly fork of Node.js with an open governance model", this should be updated to more accurately reflect the current state of the foundation. It's minor, yes, but these things tend to be important.

/cc @mikeal @nodejs/tsc

@brendanashworth brendanashworth added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label May 16, 2015
@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor

Also, the IRC topic: A Mostly Harmless Spork of Node.js™

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

A friendly fork of Node.js with an open governance model

Isn't that still technically correct? (If you're an admin you should be able to change it though?)

A Mostly Harmless Spork of Node.js™

haha yeah, same-ish as above, but we can change that to anything. :)

I'm also going to re-structure the motd a bit and remove the node-forward links once we get suitable replacements on the site.

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented May 17, 2015

the fun thing about the tagline on github is that a bunch of people have access to edit it and I'm not sure it's logged anywhere who changes it to what, it just appears changed - so if you have access and you don't like it, then change it and we'll just have a fun and friendly edit war that will keep us all amused

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe "The future (of) Node.js —"? (Since it effectively is now?)

@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor

Been updated to 'Node.js Next', I think thats fine.

@rlidwka
Copy link
Contributor

rlidwka commented May 19, 2015

That's fine except it's boring like hell. Maybe write something like "The Future of the Node.js".

@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe @rvagg can change that (I think everyone with 'Owner' can do).

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

@mikeal could probably make something even more suiting. :)

@silverwind silverwind reopened this May 19, 2015
@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor

Reopening until consensus is reached. I'm neutral :)

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented May 19, 2015

fixed

@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor

fixed

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

👍 @rvagg

@chrisdickinson
Copy link
Contributor

Casting my vote for "input/output jerry seinfeld."

@jasnell
Copy link
Member Author

jasnell commented May 19, 2015

I feel very proud to have kicked off such a vibrant bike shedding exercise!
My current inclination is to create a script that sets the tagline to
random variations of nonsense at semi regular intervals.
On May 19, 2015 1:55 PM, "Chris Dickinson" notifications@github.com wrote:

Casting my vote for "input/output jerry seinfeld."


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1714 (comment).

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

"Mostly Harmless Spork of Node.js(tm)" -- and we've gone full circle! this is like the logo thread all over again!

@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member

ChALkeR commented May 19, 2015

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 20, 2015

"Node.js fork™". simplicity does it (but don't forget the ™!!!)

@rlidwka
Copy link
Contributor

rlidwka commented May 20, 2015

@schisma , the term "fork" sounds too harsh. I think we agreed on a term "dinglehopper".

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

do we need to like tc-agenda this or something

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented May 23, 2015

I don't think this needs to be tc-agenda, if someone comes up with something great then we'll all recognise it and it'll happen. The main problem is that it's unclear what the future of this repo is so it's not obvious how to label it now. But that's OK.

@stanier
Copy link

stanier commented May 25, 2015

"The America of node.js"?

... I'll see myself out.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

It should be messaged that this will end up becoming nodejs/node's master branch, aka it's future, or something like that.

@imyller
Copy link
Member

imyller commented May 25, 2015

How about:

"JavaScript I/O"

Thats what the iojs.org currently starts with.

@bugs181
Copy link

bugs181 commented May 26, 2015

"Turtles all the way down"

@imyller
Copy link
Member

imyller commented May 26, 2015

@bugs181 Actually io.js might just be "The turtle on top of V8"

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 26, 2015

Why not go back to its roots: "libuv javascript bindings"

@stanier
Copy link

stanier commented May 26, 2015

Something along the lines of "Node.js leveled up" would fit, considering io.js's implementation of ES6

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

"Over 9000 in no time"? The way V8 is driving the version numbers...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 26, 2015

@bnoordhuis best one so far.

@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member

ChALkeR commented May 29, 2015

The tagline looks updated. Could this be closed now?

@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor

So be it. "Node.js, but with bigger and faster version numbers" is amusingly accurate.

@bugs181
Copy link

bugs181 commented May 30, 2015

We're not actually going with this are we? I feel it doesn't do the project justice.

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented May 30, 2015

since we don't know what the future of the io.js brand & project is beyond convergence then I suggest we leave it until we have something we want to actually message

@stanier
Copy link

stanier commented May 30, 2015

Expanding off of @rlidwka's idea, something like "Node.js' true destiny" would be fitting.

  • io.js is a more updated, or "futuristic" fork of Node.js, with destiny being a synonym for future,
  • it can also be argued that io.js is better at accomplishing Node.js' original goals as a platform, as the above tagline would imply
  • simplicity is key, may be best to keep the tagline under 10 syllables

edit: Alternatively, there's always "Harder, better, faster, stronger"

@j8r
Copy link

j8r commented May 31, 2015

The light side of Node

@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member

ChALkeR commented May 31, 2015

Node.js, but with bigger and faster version numbers

«Node.js, but with bigger and faster version numbers and more fun».
Or «Release early, release often!».

@silverwind
Copy link
Contributor

Guess I'll reopen this once more, keep the suggestions coming.

@silverwind silverwind reopened this May 31, 2015
@jbergstroem
Copy link
Member

I think the real win here is focusing on the first sentence of README.md. Taglines are fun but not really where people spend most of their eye-time (insert research here).

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

I think this should probably just be handled by the evangelism/marketing team eventually. For now I'd really like to message that io.js is what nodejs/node will be based off of. (Including in the readme)

On May 31, 2015, at 4:36 PM, silverwind notifications@github.com wrote:

Guess I'll reopen this once more, keep the suggestions coming.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@chrisdickinson
Copy link
Contributor

Seems like folks are starting to take the tagline seriously – we might want to rein it in a bit, at least until nodejs/node becomes the official repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests