-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Flaky test-timers-block-eventloop #16310
Comments
/cc @nodejs/platform-s390 |
I guess the reported error is on |
@targos and @gireeshpunathil
So I guess maybe the test server was busy when this happens. Fix is easy: just change the --- a/test/sequential/test-timers-block-eventloop.js
+++ b/test/sequential/test-timers-block-eventloop.js
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ const t2 = setInterval(() => {
common.busyLoop(15);
}, 10);
-const t3 = setTimeout(common.mustNotCall('eventloop blocked!'), 100);
+const t3 = setTimeout(common.mustNotCall('eventloop blocked!'), 200); |
With this fix, failures does not happen after 1000 times running. Is a PR needed? |
@zhangzifa - makes sense, the test seem to be walking on a ridge with high sensitivity on the timing of events that does not account into the environmental factors in the system. While we wait to hear from @nodejs/platform-s390 this experiment and the proposal thereon looks reasonable to me, thanks! |
@jBarz can you take a look and comment. |
It seems like we are depending on the following fs.stat call to callback within 50 milliseconds. Otherwise the test fails. fs.stat('./nonexistent.txt', (err, stats) => {...} Increasing the timeout is one way to fix this. |
@jBarz I tested just now with |
@zhangzifa a PR would be great. |
When CPU is busy, the above sequential case fails occasionally, expand the timeout value to fix it. Fixes: nodejs#16310
When CPU is busy, the above sequential case fails occasionally, expand the timeout value to fix it. PR-URL: #16314 Fixes: #16310 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
When CPU is busy, the above sequential case fails occasionally, expand the timeout value to fix it. PR-URL: #16314 Fixes: #16310 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
When CPU is busy, the above sequential case fails occasionally, expand the timeout value to fix it. PR-URL: #16314 Fixes: #16310 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
When CPU is busy, the above sequential case fails occasionally, expand the timeout value to fix it. PR-URL: nodejs/node#16314 Fixes: nodejs/node#16310 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
When CPU is busy, the above sequential case fails occasionally, expand the timeout value to fix it. PR-URL: #16314 Fixes: #16310 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
When CPU is busy, the above sequential case fails occasionally, expand the timeout value to fix it. PR-URL: #16314 Fixes: #16310 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
When CPU is busy, the above sequential case fails occasionally, expand the timeout value to fix it. PR-URL: #16314 Fixes: #16310 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
When CPU is busy, the above sequential case fails occasionally, expand the timeout value to fix it. PR-URL: nodejs/node#16314 Fixes: nodejs/node#16310 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Test added in #15072
Example failure:
https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-linuxone/9533/nodes=rhel72-s390x/console
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: