feat: add sugar method for PropertyLValue (#1651)

[neko-para]

No description provided.

[mhdawson]

@neko-para thanks for the PR, could you add a test as well?

[neko-para]

Actually i'm not sure where should i add the tests. Maybe i shall add an extra entry?

[neko-para]

@neko-para thanks for the PR, could you add a test as well?

Tests added.

[mhdawson]

@neko-para just to confirm its not possible to use the existing operator:

    /// Converts an L-value to a value.
    operator Value() const;

instead of adding the AsValue method ?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.79%. Comparing base (b347dbe) to head (740d16c).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1655      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.76%   65.79%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines        2144     2146       +2     
  Branches      715      715              
==========================================
+ Hits         1410     1412       +2     
  Misses        162      162              
  Partials      572      572              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[neko-para]

@neko-para just to confirm its not possible to use the existing operator:

    /// Converts an L-value to a value.
    operator Value() const;

instead of adding the AsValue method ?

The cast operator should always work. Adding the method is generally only for convenience, as explicit calling cast operator is not as intuitive as calling method.