Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 9, 2017. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 9, 2017. It is now read-only.

Add @bengl to @nodejs/security #149

Closed

Description

@bengl

I'd like to be added to the @nodejs/security team. I couldn't find any defined process for inclusion in the team (and maybe that's something that needs to be addressed), so @jasnell suggested I should just ask here in an issue on CTC. I'm a Node.js collaborator working at a Node.js security company, and it would be nice if we could be as up-to-date as possible with the security-happenings and contribute to the best of our ability.

Activity

  1. jasnell commented on Jun 29, 2017

    @jasnell
    Member

    ping @nodejs/ctc @nodejs/security ... definite +1 on this one. Any objections?

  2. mcollina commented on Jun 29, 2017

    @mcollina
    SponsorMember

    Definitely +1.

  3. bnoordhuis commented on Jun 29, 2017

    @bnoordhuis
    Member

    @nodejs/security is already bigger than is responsible, IMO. Access should be on a need-to-know basis, which, sorry @bengl, as far as I can see doesn't apply to you.

  4. rvagg commented on Jun 29, 2017

    @rvagg
    Member

    I kind of agree with Ben here, sorry to say, we need to be a bit more careful in widening this particular tent. We already have a bunch of members that are deriving more value from inclusion than providing and what we need is clear additive value.

  5. jasnell commented on Jun 29, 2017

    @jasnell
    Member

    We already have a bunch of members that are deriving more value from inclusion than providing

    Perhaps what we need, then, is to rotate some folks out in favor of bringing in new individuals who have a higher likelihood of participation.

  6. jbergstroem commented on Jun 29, 2017

    @jbergstroem
    Member

    @jasnell said:
    Perhaps what we need, then, is to rotate some folks out in favor of bringing in new individuals who have a higher likelihood of participation.

    I agree with this. Lets try to find a size that CTC is comfortable with and slim it based on your suggestion?

  7. Trott commented on Sep 8, 2017

    @Trott
    Member

    This repo isn't active anymore, but perhaps @bengl would like to open this in the TSC repo? Either way, I'm going to close this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions