Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: export WebFormData #559

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2024
Merged

fix: export WebFormData #559

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2024

Conversation

fengmk2
Copy link
Member

@fengmk2 fengmk2 commented Dec 6, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced WebFormData as an alternative export for FormData, enhancing compatibility and clarity.
    • Added a new BufferStream class to manage data chunk buffering efficiently.
  • Tests

    • Implemented a new test suite for validating data posting using BufferStream with WebFormData.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new export named WebFormData from the FormData.js module, providing an alternative name for the existing FormData. Additionally, a new class BufferStream is added, which extends Node.js's Transform stream to manage incoming data chunks with a fixed buffer size of 1 MB. A new test suite is created to validate the integration of BufferStream with WebFormData, ensuring proper functionality through structured tests using the Vitest framework.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/index.ts New export added: FormData as WebFormData from ./FormData.js.
test/fixtures/BufferStream.ts New class added: class BufferStream extends Transform, implementing a buffering mechanism for data.
test/formData-with-BufferStream.test.ts New test file created to validate posting data using BufferStream with WebFormData.

Poem

In the burrow deep, where the data flows,
A new stream hops in, as the buffer grows.
With WebFormData, we dance and play,
Testing our paths in a joyful array.
Hooray for the changes, let the bytes gleam,
A rabbit's delight in the code we dream! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Open in Stackblitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/node-modules/urllib@559

commit: fd1f7bd

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.62%. Comparing base (0cd9b06) to head (fd1f7bd).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #559   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.62%   94.62%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines        1227     1227           
  Branches      298      296    -2     
=======================================
  Hits         1161     1161           
  Misses         62       62           
  Partials        4        4           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
test/fixtures/BufferStream.ts (6)

14-17: Make the realloc method private

The realloc method is an internal utility and should not be part of the public API.

Apply this diff to make the method private:

-export function realloc() {
+private realloc() {

23-24: Translate comments to English for broader accessibility

The comments on lines 23 to 24 are in Chinese, which may not be understood by all contributors.

Consider translating these comments to English:

-// 缓冲区未满
-// - 向缓冲区写入
+// Buffer is not full
+// - Write to the buffer

31-34: Translate comments to English for consistency

The comments explaining the condition when the buffer is exactly full are in Chinese.

Translate the comments for clarity:

-// 缓冲区正好满
-// - 拷贝到缓冲区以后, 将 chunk 返回
-// - 刷新缓冲区
+// Buffer is exactly full
+// - Copy into the buffer, then push the chunk
+// - Refresh the buffer

41-44: Translate comments to English for better understanding

The comments describing the scenario when the buffer size is exceeded are in Chinese.

Translate the comments for clarity:

-// 超过缓冲区大小
-// - 拷贝到缓冲区以后, 将 chunk 返回
-// - 刷新缓冲区
-// - 将超出的部分拷贝到新的缓冲区中
+// Buffer size exceeded
+// - Copy into the buffer, then push the chunk
+// - Refresh the buffer
+// - Copy the remaining data into the new buffer

52-55: Handle large chunks more efficiently

In the special case where the incoming chunk is larger than BUF_SIZE, the code directly pushes the sliced chunk. However, this could be optimized.

Consider avoiding the buffering of extremely large chunks altogether and handling them separately to improve performance.


65-68: Optimize buffer handling in the _flush method

Allocating a new buffer and copying data may introduce unnecessary overhead.

You can push the existing buffer slice directly:

-if (this.offset) {
-  const chunk = Buffer.alloc(this.offset);
-  this.buf.copy(chunk);
-  this.push(chunk);
-  this.offset = 0;
+if (this.offset > 0) {
+  this.push(this.buf.slice(0, this.offset));
+  this.offset = 0;
 }
test/formData-with-BufferStream.test.ts (2)

23-25: Missing error handling for streams

There is no error handling for fileStream and bufferStream, which could lead to unhandled exceptions if an error occurs during the streaming process.

Add error listeners to handle potential stream errors:

...
fileStream.on('error', (err) => {
  // Handle file stream error
  console.error('File stream error:', err);
});
bufferStream.on('error', (err) => {
  // Handle buffer stream error
  console.error('Buffer stream error:', err);
});
...

31-37: Consider using a single HttpClient instance for all tests

Creating a new HttpClient instance within each test may not be necessary and could add overhead.

Instantiate the HttpClient once in the beforeAll hook:

 let close: any;
 let _url: string;
+let httpClient: HttpClient;

 beforeAll(async () => {
   const { closeServer, url } = await startServer();
   close = closeServer;
   _url = url;
+  httpClient = new HttpClient();
 });

And then use httpClient in your tests.

src/index.ts (1)

71-71: Potential naming confusion with WebFormData export

While exporting FormData as WebFormData helps distinguish it from Node.js FormData, it may still cause confusion due to the similar naming.

Consider providing documentation or using a more distinctive name to clarify the difference between the two. Alternatively, if both FormData implementations are needed, explicitly export both:

-export { FormData as WebFormData } from './FormData.js';
+export { FormData as WebFormData, FormData as NodeFormData } from './FormData.js';
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d2b64c1 and fd1f7bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • test/fixtures/BufferStream.ts (1 hunks)
  • test/formData-with-BufferStream.test.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/index.ts (1)

71-71: Verify the impact of the new export on existing code

Adding a new export may affect existing imports in the codebase if there are modules that rely on the default FormData export.

Run the following script to search for existing imports of FormData and assess whether they need to be updated:

✅ Verification successful

The previous search had syntax issues, but we found some initial insights. Let's verify:

  1. If any files are importing FormData directly from index.ts
  2. If there are any default imports that might be affected
  3. The actual FormData implementation to understand the export structure

No impact from the new export alias

The verification shows that the change is safe because:

  1. FormData is already exported from ./FormData.js and only used internally by HttpClient.ts
  2. The new export WebFormData is just an alias that doesn't modify the existing export
  3. No files in the codebase import FormData directly from index.ts
  4. The implementation in FormData.ts shows it's a class that extends form-data package, and this structure remains unchanged
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all occurrences of FormData imports.

# Search for import statements importing FormData from index.ts
rg "import\s+{\s*FormData\s*}" -t js -t ts

# Search for code using FormData
rg "\bFormData\b" -t js -t ts

Length of output: 475


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any direct imports of FormData from index.ts
rg "from ['\"]\./index" -A 2 -t ts -t js

# Also check for any imports that might be using the default export
rg "import FormData from|import \* as .* from ['\"]\./index" -t ts -t js

# And check the actual FormData.ts implementation to understand the export
cat src/FormData.ts

Length of output: 1500

Comment on lines +5 to +72
export class BufferStream extends Transform {
private buf: Buffer;
private offset: number;

constructor(options?: any) {
super(options);
this.realloc();
}

realloc() {
this.buf = Buffer.alloc(BUF_SIZE);
this.offset = 0;
}

_transform(chunk: Buffer, _: any, callback: any) {
const currentLength = this.offset;
const chunkSize = chunk.length;
const newSize = currentLength + chunkSize;
// 缓冲区未满
// - 向缓冲区写入
if (newSize < BUF_SIZE) {
chunk.copy(this.buf, currentLength);
this.offset += chunkSize;
return callback();
}

// 缓冲区正好满
// - 拷贝到缓冲区以后, 将 chunk 返回
// - 刷新缓冲区
if (newSize === BUF_SIZE) {
chunk.copy(this.buf, currentLength);
const writeChunk = this.buf;
this.realloc();
return callback(null, writeChunk);
}

// 超过缓冲区大小
// - 拷贝到缓冲区以后, 将 chunk 返回
// - 刷新缓冲区
// - 将超出的部分拷贝到新的缓冲区中
const copyLength = BUF_SIZE - currentLength;
const remainLength = chunkSize - copyLength;
chunk.copy(this.buf, currentLength, 0, copyLength);
const writeChunk = this.buf;
this.push(writeChunk);
this.realloc();

if (remainLength > BUF_SIZE) {
// 特殊情况: 给了一个超大 chunk
// 直接将这个 chunk 返回,没必要缓冲了
this.push(chunk.slice(copyLength));
} else {
chunk.copy(this.buf, 0, copyLength);
this.offset = remainLength;
}
return callback(null);
}

_flush(callback: any) {
if (this.offset) {
const chunk = Buffer.alloc(this.offset);
this.buf.copy(chunk);
this.push(chunk);
this.offset = 0;
}
callback();
}
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Potential memory leak due to improper backpressure handling

The BufferStream class does not handle backpressure correctly. When the internal buffer reaches its limit, the stream continues to accept data without pausing the upstream source. This can lead to increased memory usage and potential memory leaks when dealing with large or continuous data streams.

To fix this issue, implement proper backpressure handling by checking the this.push() method's return value. If it returns false, you should pause reading data until the drain event is emitted.

Apply this diff to modify the _transform method:

...
- this.push(writeChunk);
+ const canContinue = this.push(writeChunk);
+ if (!canContinue) {
+   this._inputPaused = true;
+ }
...

Additionally, listen for the 'drain' event to resume processing:

+ constructor(options?: any) {
+   super(options);
+   this.realloc();
+   this._inputPaused = false;
+   this.on('drain', () => {
+     this._inputPaused = false;
+   });
+ }

And modify the _transform method to handle the pause state:

- return callback();
+ if (this._inputPaused) {
+   // Pause the upstream source
+   this.pause();
+ }
+ callback();

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +22 to +42
it('should post with BufferStream', async () => {
const fileStream = createReadStream(__filename);
const bufferStream = new BufferStream();
fileStream.pipe(bufferStream);
const formData = new WebFormData();
const fileName = basename(__filename);
formData.append('fileBufferStream', bufferStream, fileName);
formData.append('foo', 'bar');

const httpClient = new HttpClient();
const response = await httpClient.request(`${_url}multipart`, {
method: 'POST',
content: formData,
headers: formData.getHeaders(),
dataType: 'json',
});
assert.equal(response.status, 200);
// console.log(response.data);
assert.equal(response.data.files.fileBufferStream.filename, 'formData-with-BufferStream.test.ts');
assert.deepEqual(response.data.form, { foo: 'bar' });
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure proper handling of piped streams

When piping fileStream into bufferStream, there is no guarantee that all data has been read before making the HTTP request. This could result in incomplete data being sent.

Consider awaiting the end of the stream before sending the request:

-fileStream.pipe(bufferStream);
+await new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
+  fileStream.pipe(bufferStream);
+  bufferStream.on('finish', resolve);
+  bufferStream.on('error', reject);
+});

Alternatively, handle backpressure appropriately or redesign the test to account for asynchronous stream processing.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
it('should post with BufferStream', async () => {
const fileStream = createReadStream(__filename);
const bufferStream = new BufferStream();
fileStream.pipe(bufferStream);
const formData = new WebFormData();
const fileName = basename(__filename);
formData.append('fileBufferStream', bufferStream, fileName);
formData.append('foo', 'bar');
const httpClient = new HttpClient();
const response = await httpClient.request(`${_url}multipart`, {
method: 'POST',
content: formData,
headers: formData.getHeaders(),
dataType: 'json',
});
assert.equal(response.status, 200);
// console.log(response.data);
assert.equal(response.data.files.fileBufferStream.filename, 'formData-with-BufferStream.test.ts');
assert.deepEqual(response.data.form, { foo: 'bar' });
});
it('should post with BufferStream', async () => {
const fileStream = createReadStream(__filename);
const bufferStream = new BufferStream();
await new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
fileStream.pipe(bufferStream);
bufferStream.on('finish', resolve);
bufferStream.on('error', reject);
});
const formData = new WebFormData();
const fileName = basename(__filename);
formData.append('fileBufferStream', bufferStream, fileName);
formData.append('foo', 'bar');
const httpClient = new HttpClient();
const response = await httpClient.request(`${_url}multipart`, {
method: 'POST',
content: formData,
headers: formData.getHeaders(),
dataType: 'json',
});
assert.equal(response.status, 200);
// console.log(response.data);
assert.equal(response.data.files.fileBufferStream.filename, 'formData-with-BufferStream.test.ts');
assert.deepEqual(response.data.form, { foo: 'bar' });
});

@fengmk2 fengmk2 merged commit dec6b12 into master Dec 6, 2024
23 of 24 checks passed
@fengmk2 fengmk2 deleted the custom-BufferStream branch December 6, 2024 10:19
fengmk2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2024
[skip ci]

## [4.6.4](v4.6.3...v4.6.4) (2024-12-06)

### Bug Fixes

* export WebFormData ([#559](#559)) ([dec6b12](dec6b12))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant