vmalloc: fix accounting with i915

If the caller of vmap() specifies VM_MAP_PUT_PAGES (currently only the
i915 driver), we will decrement nr_vmalloc_pages and MEMCG_VMALLOC in
vfree().  These counters are incremented by vmalloc() but not by vmap() so
this will cause an underflow.  Check the VM_MAP_PUT_PAGES flag before
decrementing either counter.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241211202538.168311-1-willy@infradead.org
Fixes: b944afc ("mm: add a VM_MAP_PUT_PAGES flag for vmap")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

mm/vmalloc.c

@@ -3374,15 +3374,17 @@ void vfree(const void *addr)
 		struct page *page = vm->pages[i];
 
 		BUG_ON(!page);
-		mod_memcg_page_state(page, MEMCG_VMALLOC, -1);
+		if (!(vm->flags & VM_MAP_PUT_PAGES))
+			mod_memcg_page_state(page, MEMCG_VMALLOC, -1);
 		/*
 		 * High-order allocs for huge vmallocs are split, so
 		 * can be freed as an array of order-0 allocations
 		 */
 		__free_page(page);
 		cond_resched();
 	}
-	atomic_long_sub(vm->nr_pages, &nr_vmalloc_pages);
+	if (!(vm->flags & VM_MAP_PUT_PAGES))
+		atomic_long_sub(vm->nr_pages, &nr_vmalloc_pages);
 	kvfree(vm->pages);
 	kfree(vm);
 }