Skip to content

Fix: fsl.WarpUtils #906

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 1, 2014
Merged

Fix: fsl.WarpUtils #906

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 1, 2014

Conversation

oesteban
Copy link
Contributor

@oesteban oesteban commented Sep 1, 2014

WarpUtils failed when trying to produce jacobian output (however, the corresponding doctest was passing ¿?). This trivial PR fixes it.

oesteban added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2014
@oesteban oesteban merged commit cc2ae18 into nipy:master Sep 1, 2014
@oesteban oesteban deleted the bug/fnirtfileutils branch September 1, 2014 19:21
@@ -1513,7 +1513,7 @@ class WarpUtilsInputSpec(FSLCommandInputSpec):
'would typically be the file that was specified '
'with the --in argument when running fnirt.'))

out_format = traits.Either('field', 'spline', argstr='--outformat=%s',
out_format = traits.Either('spline', 'field', argstr='--outformat=%s',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@oesteban - shouldn't this be an Enum?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, fixing...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@satra is there any way to avoid opening a new branch and a new PR to apply such minor patches? (sorry for my ignorance about git and github). I've done that to fix it, but I feel it potentially annoying, isn't it?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unfortunately no. and a change like this also requires make specs to run.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants