ENH nipype_display_crash defaults to last created pkl file

[berleant]

No description provided.

[berleant]

ack, the travis build failed because of a network issue. How do I retry the build without pushing an empty commit?

[chrisgorgo]

You have write access to the nipy/nipype repo so yo ushould be able to
restart jobs when you log into travis-ci.org

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Shoshana Berleant <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

ack, the travis build failed because of a network issue. How do I retry
the build without pushing an empty commit?

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#1619 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAOkpyaL-8XIrTyjfKg-PUZZQwFFFSCxks5qpOqbgaJpZM4J6PoO
.

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #1619 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1619      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.63%   70.61%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1016     1016              
  Lines       50928    50928              
  Branches     7238     7238              
==========================================
- Hits        35971    35965       -6     
- Misses      13894    13898       +4     
- Partials     1063     1065       +2

Flag	Coverage Δ
#smoketests	52.56% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
#unittests	70.34% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
nipype/pipeline/plugins/tests/test_multiproc.py	63.63% <0%> (-3.04%)	⬇️
nipype/interfaces/afni/base.py	65.59% <0%> (-1.08%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5c9a751...741a0cf. Read the comment docs.

[satra]

@shoshber - do look at this PR #1608 before making too many changes here.

we will want that PR merged before this one.

[satra]

@shoshber - now that the new nipypecli has been merged, this should focus on building on top of the command there (in scripts)