Skip to content

FIX: Bug in _list_outputs function #1071

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 18, 2015
Merged

FIX: Bug in _list_outputs function #1071

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 18, 2015

Conversation

mattfeld
Copy link
Contributor

Small bugfix in the FSLXCommand _list_outputs function

@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ def _list_outputs(self):
for k in multi_out:
outputs[k] = []

for i in xrange(self.inputs.n_fibres + 1):
for i in xrange(1, self.inputs.n_fibres + 1):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mattfeld - could you add the extra space in front of the for for indentation.

also could you please update the CHANGES file?

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 70.76% when pulling d23ff24 on mattfeld:master into 5e05ffe on nipy:master.

@mick-d
Copy link
Contributor

mick-d commented Jul 17, 2015

I was just going to submit a PR. This is a small bug but with huge consequences. All the pipelines I had on multiple servers were stuck with a "TypeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute '__getitem__''' I spent a lot of time figuring out where it came from. I would say this is a critical PR. Any chance to merge it @satra ?

@satra
Copy link
Member

satra commented Jul 17, 2015

@mick-d - any chance you can update this PR on aaron's branch with current master so that it can be merged?

@mick-d
Copy link
Contributor

mick-d commented Jul 17, 2015

@satra I did it but creating a new PR #1145 on the way, is that all right?

@satra satra merged commit d23ff24 into nipy:master Jul 18, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants