Rename Clay_Rectangle to Clay_BoundingBox to prevent confusion #4
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I made what I believe to be a mistake in naming the internal {x, y, width, height} struct
Clay_Rectangle.Unfortunately this is a breaking change if you are referencing the struct by name, but there's too much of an overlap / confusion with the element macro
CLAY_RECTANGLE, and I would like there to be a clear mental model of "rectangle means the element", so I've renamed the struct toClay_BoundingBox, which is more in line with how it is referred to in render commands anyway.