Skip to content

Conversation

@backportbot
Copy link

@backportbot backportbot bot commented May 15, 2025

Backport of PR #51603

susnux
susnux previously approved these changes May 15, 2025
*
* @psalm-type ObjectMetaData = array{mtime?: \DateTime, etag?: string, size?: int, mimetype?: string, filename?: string}
*
* @since 32.0.0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OCP backport? Then this should be 31?
Or better not add the public interface on the backport?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Moved the interface to the private namespace for the backport

@susnux susnux dismissed their stale review May 15, 2025 15:50

ocp?

@icewind1991 icewind1991 force-pushed the backport/51603/stable31 branch from d689903 to 28b09cf Compare May 15, 2025 16:01
@icewind1991 icewind1991 requested a review from susnux May 15, 2025 16:24
Signed-off-by: Robin Appelman <robin@icewind.nl>
Signed-off-by: Robin Appelman <robin@icewind.nl>
Signed-off-by: Robin Appelman <robin@icewind.nl>
Signed-off-by: Robin Appelman <robin@icewind.nl>
Signed-off-by: Robin Appelman <robin@icewind.nl>
Signed-off-by: Robin Appelman <robin@icewind.nl>
@icewind1991 icewind1991 force-pushed the backport/51603/stable31 branch from 28b09cf to 780766b Compare May 16, 2025 08:41
@icewind1991 icewind1991 merged commit d18ff62 into stable31 May 16, 2025
205 of 216 checks passed
@icewind1991 icewind1991 deleted the backport/51603/stable31 branch May 16, 2025 19:36
@nextcloud-bot nextcloud-bot mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2025
10 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants