Skip to content

Conversation

@skjnldsv
Copy link
Contributor

@skjnldsv skjnldsv commented May 7, 2025

So, we use watch everywhere, literally for over 7 years.
I see some repos that are slowly usig this new dev:watch syntax. Can we please stick to the one we used for years ? 🙈

Signed-off-by: John Molakvoæ <skjnldsv@users.noreply.github.com>
@skjnldsv skjnldsv self-assigned this May 7, 2025
@skjnldsv skjnldsv added the 3. to review Waiting for reviews label May 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@susnux susnux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do not care, I thought dev:watch was the standard like having dev and dev:watch (similar test and test:coverage).

Should be documented somewhere.

@skjnldsv
Copy link
Contributor Author

skjnldsv commented May 7, 2025

@skjnldsv skjnldsv merged commit ec56170 into main May 7, 2025
25 checks passed
@skjnldsv skjnldsv deleted the skjnldsv-patch-1 branch May 7, 2025 08:02
@susnux susnux mentioned this pull request May 12, 2025
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3. to review Waiting for reviews

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants