chore(docs): add link to azure tables adapter documentation

[halvaradop]

☕️ Reasoning

This pull request adds the missing link to the Azure Tables Adapter documentation in the README file, making it easier for users to access information about the package.

Additionally, I would suggest adding more comprehensive information to the README files of the core and next-auth packages. As they are the main packages of the library, enhancing these documents with more detailed descriptions could provide better guidance and clarity for users and contributors. What do you think?

🧢 Checklist

• Documentation
• Tests
• Ready to be merged

🎫 Affected issues

📌 Resources

• Security guidelines
• Contributing guidelines
• Code of conduct
• Contributing to Open Source

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
auth-docs	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Sep 24, 2024 2:53am

1 Skipped Deployment

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
next-auth-docs	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Sep 24, 2024 2:53am

[vercel]

@halvaradop is attempting to deploy a commit to the authjs Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 38.78%. Comparing base (538dd77) to head (7036954).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #11899   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   38.78%   38.78%           
=======================================
  Files         189      189           
  Lines       29818    29818           
  Branches     1278     1278           
=======================================
  Hits        11565    11565           
  Misses      18253    18253           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[balazsorban44]

Thanks! Regarding adding more info to the README, it would make us have to split documentation efforts. Initially, we had more information in the package READMEs.

But maybe it's worth revisiting...?

@halvaradop I have noticed your contributions, and we really appreciae them! If you would like to have closer collaboration, feel free to reach out to my on https://x.com/balazsorban44 or discord.authjs.dev! 💚