-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 399
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
config index fix #1417
config index fix #1417
Conversation
ade0dee
to
7e9913b
Compare
…lex essentially by breaking the functions down further. Updated all jsdoc to be compliant with linter.
7e9913b
to
a35867a
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1417 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 92.53% 92.56% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 175 175
Lines 35610 35671 +61
Branches 23 23
==========================================
+ Hits 32951 33018 +67
+ Misses 2659 2653 -6
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Small nit about one of the jsdocs. Also, can we log a ticket to bump up the branch coverage here? Seems like we would want tests on some of the defaulting behaviors that currently aren't covered.
Co-authored-by: Jessica Lopatta <jlopatta@newrelic.com>
|
Proposed Release Notes
Links
Closes NEWRELIC-5278
Details
Extracted pieces of logic into their own functions to make certain functions less complex. I also bumped our
ecmaVersion
in eslint to 2020 as Node.js 14 is 95% compliant. The only thing it does not support is spread parameters after optional chaining. I think we will be safe but I can dig into specifically not allowing this.