Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add column-specific search fields to tables #9583

Open
jeremystretch opened this issue Jun 22, 2022 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #15073
Open

Add column-specific search fields to tables #9583

jeremystretch opened this issue Jun 22, 2022 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #15073
Assignees
@DanSheps
Labels
complexity: medium Requires a substantial but not unusual amount of effort to implement netbox status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation topic: UI/UX User interface or user experience related work type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application

Comments

@jeremystretch
Copy link
Member

NetBox version

v3.2.5

Feature type

New functionality

Proposed functionality

Add a search field to the top of all relevant columns in each table, to match on values in that column specifically. For example, the search field for the "site" column in the devices table will match only on site name/slug.

Use case

Provides a convenient path for the user to filter results on specific fields rather than relying on the general purpose "quick search" field, which may return undesired results, and may not filter on all fields being displayed.

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application status: under review Further discussion is needed to determine this issue's scope and/or implementation labels Jun 22, 2022
@jeremystretch jeremystretch mentioned this issue Jun 23, 2022
Closed
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added needs milestone Awaiting prioritization for inclusion with a future NetBox release and removed status: under review Further discussion is needed to determine this issue's scope and/or implementation labels Jun 28, 2022
@PieterL75
Copy link
Contributor

Will this work for any field that we can add to a table ?
also custom fields, custom links, etc..

@jeremystretch jeremystretch added status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation and removed needs milestone Awaiting prioritization for inclusion with a future NetBox release labels May 5, 2023
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added this to the v4.0 milestone May 5, 2023
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the topic: UI/UX User interface or user experience related work label Jan 5, 2024
@DanSheps DanSheps self-assigned this Feb 1, 2024
@tbotnz
Copy link

tbotnz commented Feb 1, 2024

can we ask that this is toggle-able from a UI perspective (& by default hidden) sometimes these can clutter UI

@DanSheps DanSheps linked a pull request Feb 7, 2024 that will close this issue
Open
DanSheps added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2024
@DanSheps
Final work on #9583 for basic functionality
50557c0
@jeremystretch jeremystretch removed this from the v4.0 milestone May 3, 2024
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the complexity: medium Requires a substantial but not unusual amount of effort to implement label May 23, 2024
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the netbox label Nov 1, 2024 — with Linear
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@DanSheps DanSheps

Labels
complexity: medium Requires a substantial but not unusual amount of effort to implement netbox status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation topic: UI/UX User interface or user experience related work type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Closes: #9583 - Add column specific search field to tables netbox-community/netbox
4 participants
@DanSheps @jeremystretch @tbotnz @PieterL75