You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When you filter for node types the creation/insert dialog it would be nice if the dialog would automatically highlights the first filter result.
In this case »Text/Bild Kombination«.
If you’d hit enter it would "instantly" insert the currently selected node type (in this case) below node type, which you clicked on to spawn the dialog.
"Bonus"
Selecting the other filtered ones via the arrow keys would be nice. But that would mean:
arrow keys are just for navigation between the nodes, you couldn’t move the cursors in the input field anymore
you could only move the cursor by clicking
you could only add characters or remove all of them until (using backspace) until you get to the point you wanted to edit
I would be fine with that limitation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
* FEATURE: Improvements to node type insertion screen for keyboard navigation, autofocusing filter input and node type selection, see #3031
* BUGFIX: Fix code style issues
* TASK: More prominent filter input position and styling
* TASK: Fix modal dialogs position from the top to prevent jumping if content size changes
* BUGFIX: Use valid icon size
* BUGFIX: reduce maximum amount of nodetypes
* TASK: make focused nodetype selection more robust
Co-authored-by: Daniel Kestler <>
Co-authored-by: Markus Günther <info@unikka.de>
Description
When you filter for node types the creation/insert dialog it would be nice if the dialog would automatically highlights the first filter result.
In this case »Text/Bild Kombination«.
If you’d hit enter it would "instantly" insert the currently selected node type (in this case) below node type, which you clicked on to spawn the dialog.
"Bonus"
Selecting the other filtered ones via the arrow keys would be nice. But that would mean:
backspace
) until you get to the point you wanted to editI would be fine with that limitation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: