-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create SSM secret automatically - partially solve #389 #418
Conversation
- SSM secret is not created automatically.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this PR! Feel free to merge!
I realise that this is not a SecretString
, but it is still probably worth making this automated, as there's already a test that covers this via unit test should hit SSM with Decryption option
.
Sadly, CloudFormation doesn't support creating a SecureString parameter type. Anyway with this, at least we test that Laconia/Config reads information from SSM. :-) |
The parameter is being created in acceptance.spec.js because CloudFormation does not support SecretString creation, obviously due to security reason. In our case, as this is not really a secret, it is safe for us to have the plain text secret in our test. This closes #418
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @hugosenari. I have another PR that will close this PR: #432. Let me know what you think!
close this in favor of PR: #432 |
The parameter is being created in acceptance.spec.js because CloudFormation does not support SecretString creation, obviously due to security reason. In our case, as this is not really a secret, it is safe for us to have the plain text secret in our test. This closes nearst#418
#389 - Ease the run of manual acceptance tests: