chore: use correct shard_id type

[Trisfald]

Trivial change to use the correct ShardId type

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.43%. Comparing base (57b9b81) to head (fcddcf1).
Report is 6 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #12829      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   70.41%   70.43%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         848      848              
  Lines      174849   174852       +3     
  Branches   174849   174852       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits       123117   123154      +37     
+ Misses      46485    46440      -45     
- Partials     5247     5258      +11     

Flag	Coverage Δ
backward-compatibility	0.16% <ø> (ø)
db-migration	0.16% <ø> (?)
genesis-check	1.41% <ø> (ø)
linux	70.04% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
linux-nightly	70.07% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
pytests	1.71% <ø> (+0.29%)	⬆️
sanity-checks	1.52% <ø> (?)
unittests	70.26% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
upgradability	0.20% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.