[Suggestion] for the "inner vs outer" issue

[runiq]

Hey,

I hope I'm not posting this in the wrong place, but the issue tracker seemed to be preferable to using email.

Would it be a good idea to have the "inner" motions leave out the function/class definition line(s) instead of the trailing whitespace? I'm thinking of something like this:

def f(a, b):
    print "I am an example function!"
    return a + b

Now, when issuing, say, vif to vim, only the marked lines would be selected:

  def f(a, b):
*     print "I am an example function!"
*     return a + b

While the behavior of "outer" would select all lines corresponding to the function, including the def f(a, b) part.

[jeetsukumaran]

Yep, this, to me makes the most sense.

I would like to continue to include the blank line after the function, though.