Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix #650 OS_chmod uses read or write access. #663

Merged

Conversation

zanzaben
Copy link
Contributor

@zanzaben zanzaben commented Dec 1, 2020

Describe the contribution
Fixes #650 by checking for either read or write access instead of just read access

Testing performed
Used the Chmod tests I am building in another branch that found this issue in the first place.

Expected behavior changes
A clear and concise description of how this contribution will change behavior and level of impact.
-No changes

System(s) tested on
Ubuntu 20.04

Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Alex Campbell GSFC

@zanzaben zanzaben added the CCB:Ready Pull request is ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB) label Dec 1, 2020
@zanzaben zanzaben changed the base branch from main to integration-candidate December 1, 2020 19:16
@astrogeco
Copy link
Contributor

CCB 20201202 - APPROVED

@astrogeco astrogeco added CCB-20201202 and removed CCB:Ready Pull request is ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB) labels Dec 2, 2020
@astrogeco astrogeco merged commit 77300fd into nasa:integration-candidate Dec 7, 2020
astrogeco added a commit to nasa/cFS that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2020
astrogeco added a commit to nasa/cFS that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2020
@skliper skliper added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Sep 24, 2021
jphickey added a commit to jphickey/osal that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
Rather than directly referencing a constant, prefer to use
the sizeof() operator on the instance or type whenever possible.
jphickey added a commit to jphickey/osal that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
Update use of uint32 to size_t in UT support code
jphickey added a commit to jphickey/osal that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
Fix all use of uint32 for sizes, replace with size_t
Scrub all other types to make sure use is consistent,
using proper typedef whenever available.
jphickey added a commit to jphickey/osal that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
Fix all use of uint32 for sizes, replace with size_t
Scrub all other types to make sure use is consistent,
using proper typedef whenever available.
jphickey added a commit to jphickey/osal that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
Fix all use of uint32 for sizes, replace with size_t
Scrub all other types to make sure use is consistent,
using proper typedef whenever available.
jphickey added a commit to jphickey/osal that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
Fix all use of uint32 for sizes, replace with size_t
Scrub all other types to make sure use is consistent,
using proper typedef whenever available.
jphickey added a commit to jphickey/osal that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
Fix all use of uint32 for sizes, replace with size_t
Scrub all other types to make sure use is consistent,
using proper typedef whenever available.
jphickey pushed a commit to jphickey/osal that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

OS_chmod is requiring read access
3 participants