Skip to content

Conversation

@RelaxSpirit
Copy link
Collaborator

@RelaxSpirit RelaxSpirit commented Apr 21, 2025

Description

Adding files required to complete PR Checks and update nanoFramework.TestFramework NuGet version

Motivation and Context

The need to prepare a project for passing PR Checks and subsequent Pull requests

How Has This Been Tested?

Project build, passing unit tests

Types of changes

  • Improvement (non-breaking change that improves a feature, code or algorithm)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue with code or algorithm)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality to code)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Config and build (change in the configuration and build system, has no impact on code or features)
  • Dependencies (update dependencies and changes associated, has no impact on code or features)
  • Unit Tests (add new Unit Test(s) or improved existing one(s), has no impact on code or features)
  • Documentation (changes or updates in the documentation, has no impact on code or features)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project (only if there are changes in source code).
  • My changes require an update to the documentation (there are changes that require the docs website to be updated).
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly (the changes require an update on the docs in this repo).
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have tested everything locally and all new and existing tests passed (only if there are changes in source code).
  • I have added new tests to cover my changes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added package lock files to ensure consistent dependency resolution for test and main projects. No changes to user-facing features or functionality.

@nfbot
Copy link
Member

nfbot commented Apr 21, 2025

@RelaxSpirit I've fixed the checklist for you.
FYI, the correct format is [x], no spaces inside brackets, no other chars.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 21, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • NFUnitTest/NFUnitTest.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

Three new packages.lock.json files have been added to the repository for the MsgPack.Tests, NFUnitTest, and nanoFramework.MessagePack.Net projects. These files document the resolved package dependencies, including direct and transitive dependencies, their versions, and integrity hashes. The lock files are targeted at specific frameworks (.NET 9.0 and nanoFramework 1.0) and ensure reproducible package restores for their respective projects. No changes were made to code or public APIs; only dependency resolution metadata was introduced.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
MsgPack.Tests/packages.lock.json Added lock file specifying resolved NuGet dependencies (direct and transitive) for MsgPack.Tests targeting .NET 9.0.
NFUnitTest/packages.lock.json Added lock file listing fixed nanoFramework package dependencies for NFUnitTest targeting nanoFramework 1.0.
nanoFramework.MessagePack.Net/packages.lock.json Added lock file for nanoFramework.MessagePack.Net project, indicating no specific packages under net9.0 target.

Sequence Diagram(s)

No sequence diagram is generated as the changes only introduce package lock files and do not affect control flow or feature logic.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Member

@josesimoes josesimoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@josesimoes
Copy link
Member

/az run pipeline

@josesimoes
Copy link
Member

/azp run pipeline

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@josesimoes
Copy link
Member

/azp run pipeline

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@josesimoes
Copy link
Member

/azp run pipeline

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@josesimoes
Copy link
Member

@nfbot updatedependencies

@josesimoes
Copy link
Member

/azp run pipeline

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@josesimoes
Copy link
Member

@dotnet-policy-service rerun

@josesimoes
Copy link
Member

@RelaxSpirit closing this as there are issues with the pipeline triggering.
I've copied over these in #4 which is now merged.
Please update "main" from upstream and go for the next PR. Hopefully everything will work just fine.

@josesimoes josesimoes closed this Apr 21, 2025
@nfbot nfbot added invalid This doesn't seem right and removed Type: dependencies Area: Config-and-Build labels Apr 21, 2025
@RelaxSpirit
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@josesimoes Thank you so much for your help!
The next PR is almost ready :)

@RelaxSpirit RelaxSpirit deleted the packeges_locks branch April 21, 2025 16:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

invalid This doesn't seem right

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants