Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust DTO accessors to make them public #277

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 14, 2022
Merged

Adjust DTO accessors to make them public #277

merged 8 commits into from
Nov 14, 2022

Conversation

torbacz
Copy link
Contributor

@torbacz torbacz commented Nov 13, 2022

Description

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Local build + pipeline (does not require more testing in my opinion)

Screenshots

Types of changes

  • Improvement (non-breaking change that improves a feature, code or algorithm)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue with code or algorithm)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality to code)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Config and build (change in the configuration and build system, has no impact on code or features)
  • Dependencies (update dependencies and changes associated, has no impact on code or features)
  • Unit Tests (add new Unit Test(s) or improved existing one(s), has no impact on code or features)
  • Documentation (changes or updates in the documentation, has no impact on code or features)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project (only if there are changes in source code).
  • My changes require an update to the documentation (there are changes that require the docs website to be updated).
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly (the changes require an update on the docs in this repo).
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have tested everything locally and all new and existing tests passed (only if there are changes in source code).
  • I have added new tests to cover my changes.

…pply XML comments on all required public members.
Copy link
Member

@Ellerbach Ellerbach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, looks good to me! Sealed is a good choice for the classes as they should not be inherited or extended. @josesimoes for a quick look as it's a sensitive nuget :-)

nanoFramework.Json/JsonArray.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
nanoFramework.Json/JsonObject.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
nanoFramework.Json/JsonProperty.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
nanoFramework.Json/JsonValue.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
nanoFramework.Json/JsonValue.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@torbacz
Copy link
Contributor Author

torbacz commented Nov 14, 2022

I've also remove some parameterless constructors. The logic behind was simple - previously they were internal without any references. Now, because we are going with "public" let's clean it to keep public API minimal as possible.

Copy link
Member

@josesimoes josesimoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we're good now!
Thank you for another improvement. 👍🏻

@josesimoes josesimoes enabled auto-merge (squash) November 14, 2022 14:16
@josesimoes josesimoes changed the title Adjust Json DTO accessors to allow using them in custom converters. Adjust DTO accessors to make them public Nov 14, 2022
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 14, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@josesimoes josesimoes merged commit eba39fd into nanoframework:main Nov 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unable to use JSON converters due to encapsulation
4 participants