Skip to content

Conversation

@nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Nov 27, 2024

Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.42 to 3.0.45

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated the nanoFramework.TestFramework dependency across multiple device test packages to version 3.0.45, enhancing testing capabilities and ensuring compatibility with the latest features.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved issues related to outdated testing framework versions by upgrading to 3.0.45 in various device tests.

Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.42 to 3.0.45</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces updates to the packages.lock.json files across multiple device test directories. Specifically, the version of the nanoFramework.TestFramework dependency is updated from 3.0.42 to 3.0.45. The changes include modifications to the requested, resolved, and contentHash fields for this dependency, while all other dependencies remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
devices/Bmm150/Bmm150.tests/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.42 to 3.0.45, with updated contentHash.
devices/Bmxx80/tests/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.42 to 3.0.45, with updated contentHash.
devices/Button/Tests/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.TestFramework from [3.0.42, 3.0.42] to [3.0.45, 3.0.45], with updated contentHash.
devices/Charlieplex/tests/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.42 to 3.0.45, with updated contentHash.
devices/Ds1621/tests/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.42 to 3.0.45, with updated contentHash.
devices/Mcp7940xx/tests/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.42 to 3.0.45, with updated contentHash.
devices/Ssd13xx/tests/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.42 to 3.0.45, with updated contentHash.

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@nfbot nfbot merged commit 043ae42 into develop Nov 27, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/63a81044-40c4-47e4-9541-242b46f9bb97 branch November 27, 2024 03:39
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7129967 and 4257ed3.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (18)
  • devices/At24cxx/tests/NFUnitTest.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/At24cxx/tests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/Bmm150/Bmm150.tests/Bmm150.tests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/Bmm150/Bmm150.tests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/Bmxx80/tests/Bmxx80.Tests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/Bmxx80/tests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/Button/Tests/Tests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/Button/Tests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/Charlieplex/tests/Charlieplex.Tests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/Charlieplex/tests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/Ds1621/tests/NFUnitTest.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/Ds1621/tests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/GnssDevice/Tests/GnssDeviceTests/GnssDevice.Tests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/GnssDevice/Tests/GnssDeviceTests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/Mcp7940xx/tests/NFUnitTest.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/Mcp7940xx/tests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/Ssd13xx/tests/Ssd13xx.Tests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/Ssd13xx/tests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • devices/Bmm150/Bmm150.tests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • devices/Bmxx80/tests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • devices/Button/Tests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • devices/Charlieplex/tests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • devices/Ds1621/tests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • devices/Mcp7940xx/tests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • devices/Ssd13xx/tests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
devices/Ssd13xx/tests/packages.lock.json (1)

13-15: LGTM! Version update looks correct.

The update of nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.42 to 3.0.45 is properly reflected in both the requested and resolved versions, with matching content hash.

Let's verify the package version exists in the NuGet feed:

✅ Verification successful

Version 3.0.45 is available in NuGet feed, update is valid

The package version 3.0.45 exists in the official NuGet feed, confirming this is a valid version update.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the NuGet package version exists
# Expected result: Version 3.0.45 should be listed in the available versions

curl -s "https://api.nuget.org/v3-flatcontainer/nanoframework.testframework/index.json" | jq '.versions[] | select(. == "3.0.45")'

Length of output: 139

devices/Bmm150/Bmm150.tests/packages.lock.json (1)

25-27: LGTM! Package update looks correct.

The update of nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.42 to 3.0.45 is consistent with the PR objectives. The version constraints and content hash are properly updated.

Let's verify the consistency of this update across other test directories:

devices/Mcp7940xx/tests/packages.lock.json (1)

37-39: LGTM! Clean version bump for nanoFramework.TestFramework.

The update from 3.0.42 to 3.0.45 appears to be a routine patch version increment, maintaining compatibility.

Let's verify version compatibility across the solution:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the output, I can now generate the final response since I have gathered sufficient information about the TestFramework version usage across the repository:

TestFramework version 3.0.45 is consistently used in test projects

The version bump to 3.0.45 is correctly applied across all test projects that use the TestFramework package:

  • devices/Ssd13xx/tests/packages.lock.json
  • devices/Mcp7940xx/tests/packages.lock.json
  • devices/Multiplexing/Iot.Device.Multiplexing.UnitTests/packages.lock.json
  • devices/Ds1621/tests/packages.lock.json
  • devices/Charlieplex/tests/packages.lock.json
  • devices/Button/Tests/packages.lock.json
  • devices/Bmxx80/tests/packages.lock.json
  • devices/Bmm150/Bmm150.tests/packages.lock.json
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for version consistency across all test projects
# and verify there are no conflicting dependencies

# Search for all packages.lock.json files in test directories
fd packages.lock.json -t f | while read -r file; do
    echo "Checking $file"
    # Extract and display TestFramework version to ensure consistency
    jq -r '.dependencies.".NETnanoFramework,Version=v1.0"."nanoFramework.TestFramework".resolved' "$file"
done

Length of output: 68867

devices/Charlieplex/tests/packages.lock.json (1)

49-51: LGTM! Verify package version availability.

The update of nanoFramework.TestFramework to version 3.0.45 is consistent across the requested and resolved fields, with an appropriate content hash update.

✅ Verification successful

Version 3.0.45 is available in NuGet registry ✓

The package version update is valid and the package is publicly available in the NuGet registry, confirming this is a safe dependency update.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the updated package version exists in NuGet
# Expected: Version 3.0.45 should be listed in the available versions

curl -s https://api.nuget.org/v3-flatcontainer/nanoframework.testframework/index.json | jq '.versions[] | select(. == "3.0.45")'

Length of output: 139

devices/Bmxx80/tests/packages.lock.json (1)

43-45: LGTM! Version update matches PR objectives.

The nanoFramework.TestFramework package has been correctly updated to version 3.0.45 with matching requested and resolved versions, along with the appropriate content hash.

Comment on lines +13 to +15
"requested": "[3.0.45, 3.0.45]",
"resolved": "3.0.45",
"contentHash": "lZzOj2oP6MHRA76hDFKJ7C1M99GpLdAfegWyanEuecdB4DC04UzGBlM7HUVoUPNdzRQPbn+hWrTz907Wo/F8ng=="
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Version inconsistency detected across test projects

The verification reveals that test projects are using different versions of nanoFramework.TestFramework:

  • Most device-specific test projects (Button, Bmxx80, Ds1621, etc.) use version 3.0.45
  • System-level test projects use an older version 2.1.53:
    • tests/BinaryPrimitivesUnitTests
    • tests/System.Numerics.UnitTests
    • tests/System.Drawing.Tests
    • tests/System.Device.Model.UnitTests
    • tests/Iot.Device.Common.UnitTests
🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! Version update matches PR objectives.

The update of nanoFramework.TestFramework to version 3.0.45 is consistent with the PR objectives.

Let's verify version consistency across all test projects:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify TestFramework version consistency across all test projects
# Expected: All test projects should use version 3.0.45

# Find all packages.lock.json files in test directories
fd packages.lock.json -t f | grep -i "test" | while read -r file; do
    echo "Checking $file"
    jq -r '.dependencies.".NETnanoFramework,Version=v1.0"."nanoFramework.TestFramework".resolved' "$file"
done

Length of output: 3821

Comment on lines +37 to +39
"requested": "[3.0.45, 3.0.45]",
"resolved": "3.0.45",
"contentHash": "lZzOj2oP6MHRA76hDFKJ7C1M99GpLdAfegWyanEuecdB4DC04UzGBlM7HUVoUPNdzRQPbn+hWrTz907Wo/F8ng=="
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Inconsistent TestFramework versions detected across test projects

The verification reveals two different versions of nanoFramework.TestFramework being used:

  • Version 3.0.45 in device-specific test projects (Ds1621, Ssd13xx, etc.)
  • Version 2.1.53 in system-level test projects (System.Numerics, System.Drawing, etc.)

This version discrepancy might be intentional due to different requirements for different test categories, but it's worth highlighting for awareness.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! Version update matches PR objectives.

The update of nanoFramework.TestFramework from 3.0.42 to 3.0.45 is correctly reflected in both the requested and resolved versions, with the appropriate content hash update.

Let's verify the package version and hash:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the package version and hash across all package lock files
# Expected: Consistent version (3.0.45) across all test directories

# Find and check all packages.lock.json files
fd packages.lock.json | xargs grep -A 2 "nanoFramework.TestFramework"

Length of output: 3361

Comment on lines +43 to +45
"requested": "[3.0.45, 3.0.45]",
"resolved": "3.0.45",
"contentHash": "lZzOj2oP6MHRA76hDFKJ7C1M99GpLdAfegWyanEuecdB4DC04UzGBlM7HUVoUPNdzRQPbn+hWrTz907Wo/F8ng=="
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Version inconsistency detected in TestFramework package

All device-specific test projects under /devices/ directory are using version 3.0.45, which is consistent. However, the test projects under the /tests/ directory are using an older version 2.1.53. This indicates a version mismatch across test projects.

  • /devices/*/tests/: Using version 3.0.45

    • Bmm150.tests
    • Bmxx80/tests
    • Button/Tests
    • Charlieplex/tests
    • Ds1621/tests
    • Mcp7940xx/tests
    • Multiplexing/UnitTests
    • Ssd13xx/tests
  • /tests/: Using older version 2.1.53

    • BinaryPrimitivesUnitTests
    • Iot.Device.Common.UnitTests
    • System.Device.Model.UnitTests
    • System.Drawing.Tests
    • System.Numerics.UnitTests
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify version consistency across test projects.

Let's ensure this version update is consistent across all test projects in the repository.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for version consistency of nanoFramework.TestFramework across all test projects
# Expected: All test projects should use version 3.0.45

echo "Checking TestFramework versions in all packages.lock.json files..."
fd "packages\.lock\.json$" | xargs grep -A 2 '"nanoFramework.TestFramework"' 

Length of output: 3513

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants