Skip to content

Conversation

@nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Oct 4, 2024

Bumps nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Common.GnssDevice from 1.0.43 to 1.0.48

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated the GNSS device library to enhance functionality and performance.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved issues related to the previous version of the GNSS device library.

Bumps nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Common.GnssDevice from 1.0.43 to 1.0.48</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request involves an update to the packages.lock.json file for the .NETnanoFramework dependencies. Specifically, it updates the version of the nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Common.GnssDevice package from 1.0.43 to 1.0.48, along with an updated content hash. All other dependencies remain unchanged, indicating a targeted upgrade to the GNSS device library.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
devices/AtModem/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Common.GnssDevice from 1.0.43 to 1.0.48. All other dependencies remain unchanged.

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a78e79c and bac5fdc.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)
  • devices/AtModem/AtModem.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/AtModem/AtModem.nuspec is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/AtModem/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/AtModem/samples/AtModem.Sample.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • devices/AtModem/samples/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • devices/AtModem/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
devices/AtModem/packages.lock.json (1)

13-15: LGTM: Package version update looks good.

The update of nanoFramework.Iot.Device.Common.GnssDevice from version 1.0.43 to 1.0.48 is consistent with the PR objectives. The change is correctly reflected in both the "requested" and "resolved" fields, and the content hash has been updated accordingly.

To ensure this change doesn't unexpectedly affect other parts of the project, let's verify if there are any direct references to this package version:


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@nfbot nfbot merged commit 9a3f841 into develop Oct 4, 2024
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/9c5aed94-3d42-42cd-ac3c-934a80f45984 branch October 4, 2024 03:33
This was referenced Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants