feat(benchmark): mutation-validity lint — flag inert (no-defect) mutations#49
Conversation
…tions Deep-research biggest-lever item: ~100 challenges have a file-modify mutation that only bare-appends `// modified by benchmark` — pure file churn that creates no detectable defect. 95 are (correctly) tagged infeasible/fictional and excluded from the capability metric, but 5 are tagged FEASIBLE — miscategorised: they claim to be detectable yet can never pass (the seeded "defect" is a no-op), silently dragging the capability score. bin/mutation-validity.cjs classifies inert mutations and surfaces the miscategorised class (exit 1 if any FEASIBLE inert remain), so they get a real mutation or an honest re-tag — and future inert padding of the corpus is caught. `npm run mutation-validity`. 3 tests. Current: 100 inert (63 infeasible, 32 fictional — ok; 5 feasible — MISCATEGORISED: BENCH-026/029/040/044/079). Converting those 5 (and reviewing the 95) to real anchored mutations is the tracked follow-on this lint now makes visible and gate-able. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 50 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Deep-research biggest-lever item. ~100 challenges have a
file-modifymutation that only bare-appends// modified by benchmark— pure file churn creating no detectable defect. 95 are correctly taggedinfeasible/fictional(excluded from the capability metric), but 5 are taggedfeasible— miscategorised: they claim to be detectable yet can never pass, silently dragging the capability score.bin/mutation-validity.cjsclassifies inert mutations and surfaces the miscategorised class (exit 1 if anyfeasibleinert remain), so they get a real mutation or an honest re-tag — and future inert padding is caught.npm run mutation-validity; 3 tests. Converting the 5 (and reviewing the 95) to real anchored mutations is the tracked follow-on this lint makes visible and gate-able.🤖 Generated with Claude Code