Drop support for net461?

[bgrainger]

To simplify the library (removing ifdefs), reduce package size, and possibly enable new features (e.g., pipelines, Utf8String?) remove support for the following platforms:

• netstandard1.3 done in Remove netstandard1.3 support #1031
• .NET 4.5.x done in Remove net45 support #1209
• .NET 4.6.x

Should the minimum .NET Framework version be updated to 4.8, or stay at 4.7.1? Or dropped entirely?

Right now System.IO.Pipelines still supports netstandard1.3, so dropping old platforms may not strictly be necessary.

This is also a current advantage of MySqlConnector over MySql.Data: we support netstandard1.3 (vs netstandard2.0) and net45 (vs net452).

[roji]

FYI Npgsql is dropping net45 but is retaining support for net461, mainly because for now there's nothing we seem to need urgently that would require us to drop that as well. ifdefs seem at quite tolerable levels at least for now.

[bgrainger]

See previous discussion in #506.

[bgrainger]

.NET Core 1.x support ended today: https://dotnet.microsoft.com/platform/support/policy/dotnet-core

[bgrainger]

This is also a current advantage of MySqlConnector over MySql.Data: we support netstandard1.3 (vs netstandard1.6) and net45 (vs net452).

As of MySql.Data 8.0.18, netstandard1.6 has been dropped.

[SylwesterZarebski]

.NET 4.5.1 and older is not supported by MS, thus references could be removed.

.NET 4.5.2 and 4.6 should be supported about the same as framework itself.

From: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/17455/lifecycle-faq-net-framework

.NET Framework 4.5.2: Support for .NET 4.5.2 follows the lifecycle policy of the parent OS. It is supported as a Windows component on the latest required operating system update for Windows Vista SP2, Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 SP2, Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, Windows 8.1 Update, Windows Server 2012, and Windows Server 2012 R2.

.NET Framework 4.6: Support for .NET 4.6 follows the Lifecycle Policy of the parent OS. It is supported as a Windows component on the latest required operating system update for Windows Vista SP2, Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 SP2, Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, Windows 8.1 Update, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2012 R2, and Windows 10.

Many software companies sync to above lifecycle with their products, I think this project should too.

[ViktorHofer]

As this issue is quite old, what's the current stance on this? I believe given the time that netstandard2.0 has been around and successful, is now the right time to drop anything that doesn't support it?

I believe netstandard2.0 and net461 should be the baseline of supported frameworks. I would be willing to submit a PR if we reach consensus.

[bgrainger]

From #972:

I would suggest to consider dropping support for .NET Standard 1.3 and older .NET Framework versions in favor of a broader API set and a simplified dependency graph.

Other than slightly more complex code (#ifdefs) and a larger NuGet package download size, I don't think it's "hurting" anyone to keep netstandard1.3 support. Is there any particular urgency to drop older frameworks?

It would be super helpful if NuGet would show the number of downloads for each target framework so we could evaluate the need to support each one: NuGet/NuGetGallery#3450

[bgrainger]

Note that MySqlConnector is eagerly adopting new framework features (e.g., ZLibStream in .NET 6: 1a20890) and this is not prevented by also supporting older frameworks. (Using the new preprocessor definitions (a0a14ef) makes this reasonably easy to do.)

[bgrainger]

My current thinking is that the 1.x series will continue supporting the current TFMs and that reducing TFM support (perhaps even as drastically to just net6.0 based on the current .NET LTS versions) would be a breaking change (others TBD) in a 2.0 release.

[bgrainger]

@ViktorHofer Are you able to provide any internal support within Microsoft for NuGet/NuGetGallery#3450?

As this comment NuGet/NuGetGallery#3450 (comment) indicates, it would be extremely useful for NuGet Package owners.

[ViktorHofer]

Other than slightly more complex code (#ifdefs) and a larger NuGet package download size, I don't think it's "hurting" anyone to keep netstandard1.3 support. Is there any particular urgency to drop older frameworks?

It's great to hear that MySqlConnector already adopts newest framework features 🎉. I don't think there is a strong reason to drop older frameworks. That said, doing so would simplify the dependency graph, the test matrix (netstandard1.3 applies to many platforms which would ideally be tested on/for) and to convey the message that the repo doesn't target frameworks which are out of support (which might help in the long run).

It would be super helpful if NuGet would show the number of downloads for each target framework so we could evaluate the need to support each one: NuGet/NuGetGallery#3450

Absolutely agree.

@ViktorHofer Are you able to provide any internal support within Microsoft for NuGet/NuGetGallery#3450?

I would love to be able to help here. The NuGet team knows about the feature request and honestly speaking, we ourselves would have benefited of such statistics immensely already. Unfortunately there is nothing in my power to prioritize the item higher.