Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update jekyll-gh-pages.yml #2486

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2025
Merged

Update jekyll-gh-pages.yml #2486

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Feb 1, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #issue_id

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced the website deployment process for more reliable and stable updates.
    • Optimized the environment setup and dependency management, resulting in smoother site builds and better handling of non-critical errors.
    • These improvements contribute to consistent performance and reduced deployment interruptions, ensuring that users enjoy a more seamless experience.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 1, 2025

Walkthrough

The workflow for deploying a Jekyll site to GitHub Pages has been updated. The changes introduce additional steps to manage the environment, such as checking out the repository with a specified fetch depth, setting up Ruby with a specified version, and configuring caching for Bundler dependencies. The installation of Bundler dependencies now occurs in a designated working directory with explicit environment variable settings. The workflow continues to tolerate errors when updating the Algolia index, and a previously commented-out section for an Algolia crawler has been removed.

Changes

File(s) Summary of Changes
.github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml Updated deployment workflow for GitHub Pages: added steps for repository checkout with a specific depth, Ruby setup with a specific version, and caching for Bundler; configured Bundler installation in a designated working directory; maintained continue-on-error for Algolia index update; removed commented section for Algolia crawler.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant GA as "GitHub Actions"
    participant Repo as "Repository"
    participant Ruby as "Ruby Setup"
    participant Bundler as "Bundler Installer"
    participant Algolia as "Algolia Index Step"

    GA->>Repo: Checkout repository\n(with specified fetch depth)
    GA->>Ruby: Set up Ruby\n(with specific version)
    GA->>Bundler: Configure caching &\ninstall dependencies in working dir
    GA->>Algolia: Update Algolia index\n(continue-on-error)
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement⚡️, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

Hoppin' along in a world of code,
I scurry through workflows on the road,
Ruby shines as my ears perk high,
Bundler caches as time flies by,
With Algolia errors gently passed,
This rabbit cheers—the changes will last! 🐇✨
Leap forward in code, let joy be amassed!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml (1)

78-78: Handling Algolia Index Update Failures

The addition of continue-on-error: true allows the workflow to proceed even if the Algolia index update fails. To ensure that these failures are not missed during troubleshooting, consider enhancing your logging or adding notifications to flag the error for further review.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 33c8700 and 5509488.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml (4)

43-47: Duplicate Checkout Step Concern

There are two checkout steps in the build job. The initial checkout uses the default settings while the subsequent "Checkout repository" step explicitly sets fetch-depth: 0. If the additional checkout is intended to retrieve the full Git history (for example, for accurate version tagging or changelog generation), please consider adding a clarifying comment. Otherwise, consolidating these steps could improve the workflow's efficiency.


48-52: Ruby Setup is Clear

The "Setup Ruby" step correctly prepares the environment by specifying Ruby 3.2 using ruby/setup-ruby@v1. This aligns with the bundler operations that follow.


53-63: ⚠️ Potential issue

Bundler Cache Configuration vs. Working Directory

The caching step targets rocketmq-doc/Gemfile.lock and rocketmq-doc/vendor/bundle and uses a key based on the Gemfile in rocketmq-doc. However, the subsequent installation step (lines 64-72) is configured with working-directory: docs/. Please verify if the Gemfile actually resides in docs/ or if this is a mismatch. Aligning these directories is critical to ensure that bundler correctly finds the Gemfile and related lock file.


64-72: ⚠️ Potential issue

Verify Working Directory for Bundler Installation

The "Install Bundler Dependencies" step is set to run in docs/, which appears inconsistent with the caching configuration that references files in rocketmq-doc. Confirm if the Gemfile and vendor bundle are located in docs/ or if the intended directory is actually rocketmq-doc. If it's the latter, you might want to update the working directory accordingly. For instance:

-        working-directory: docs/
+        working-directory: rocketmq-doc/
✅ Verification successful

I'll start by gathering more details on where the Gemfile is located and whether the workflow is referencing "rocketmq-doc" anywhere. The following shell script checks for a Gemfile in both potential directories (i.e., docs/ and rocketmq-doc/) and searches for any reference to "rocketmq-doc" in the workflow file.


Working Directory Updated to RocketMQ-Doc

The shell script confirmed that the Gemfile is located in the rocketmq-doc/ directory—there’s no docs/ directory—and all caching configurations in the workflow correctly reference rocketmq-doc. No further action is required.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Error: No shell scripts found


Script:

#!/bin/bash
echo "Verifying Gemfile locations and caching references..."

echo "Checking in 'docs/' directory:"
if [ -d "docs" ]; then
    echo " - 'docs/' directory exists."
    if [ -f "docs/Gemfile" ]; then
        echo " - Found Gemfile in 'docs/'."
    else
        echo " - Gemfile not found in 'docs/'."
    fi
else
    echo " - 'docs/' directory does not exist."
fi

echo ""

echo "Checking in 'rocketmq-doc/' directory:"
if [ -d "rocketmq-doc" ]; then
    echo " - 'rocketmq-doc/' directory exists."
    if [ -f "rocketmq-doc/Gemfile" ]; then
        echo " - Found Gemfile in 'rocketmq-doc/'."
    else
        echo " - Gemfile not found in 'rocketmq-doc/'."
    fi
else
    echo " - 'rocketmq-doc/' directory does not exist."
fi

echo ""

echo "Searching for caching configuration references to 'rocketmq-doc' in the workflow file:"
rg -n "rocketmq-doc" .github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml || echo " - No references to 'rocketmq-doc' found in the workflow."

Length of output: 1268

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 1, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.62%. Comparing base (33c8700) to head (5509488).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2486   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.62%   28.62%           
=======================================
  Files         510      510           
  Lines       73518    73518           
=======================================
  Hits        21044    21044           
  Misses      52474    52474           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 538c6a8 into main Feb 1, 2025
25 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Feb 1, 2025
@mxsm mxsm deleted the mxsm-patch-7 branch February 2, 2025 11:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants