-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update jekyll-gh-pages.yml #2486
Conversation
WalkthroughThe workflow for deploying a Jekyll site to GitHub Pages has been updated. The changes introduce additional steps to manage the environment, such as checking out the repository with a specified fetch depth, setting up Ruby with a specified version, and configuring caching for Bundler dependencies. The installation of Bundler dependencies now occurs in a designated working directory with explicit environment variable settings. The workflow continues to tolerate errors when updating the Algolia index, and a previously commented-out section for an Algolia crawler has been removed. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant GA as "GitHub Actions"
participant Repo as "Repository"
participant Ruby as "Ruby Setup"
participant Bundler as "Bundler Installer"
participant Algolia as "Algolia Index Step"
GA->>Repo: Checkout repository\n(with specified fetch depth)
GA->>Ruby: Set up Ruby\n(with specific version)
GA->>Bundler: Configure caching &\ninstall dependencies in working dir
GA->>Algolia: Update Algolia index\n(continue-on-error)
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉! 💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥! Note 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml (1)
78-78
: Handling Algolia Index Update FailuresThe addition of
continue-on-error: true
allows the workflow to proceed even if the Algolia index update fails. To ensure that these failures are not missed during troubleshooting, consider enhancing your logging or adding notifications to flag the error for further review.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: auto-approve
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml (4)
43-47
: Duplicate Checkout Step ConcernThere are two checkout steps in the build job. The initial checkout uses the default settings while the subsequent "Checkout repository" step explicitly sets
fetch-depth: 0
. If the additional checkout is intended to retrieve the full Git history (for example, for accurate version tagging or changelog generation), please consider adding a clarifying comment. Otherwise, consolidating these steps could improve the workflow's efficiency.
48-52
: Ruby Setup is ClearThe "Setup Ruby" step correctly prepares the environment by specifying Ruby 3.2 using
ruby/setup-ruby@v1
. This aligns with the bundler operations that follow.
53-63
:⚠️ Potential issueBundler Cache Configuration vs. Working Directory
The caching step targets
rocketmq-doc/Gemfile.lock
androcketmq-doc/vendor/bundle
and uses a key based on the Gemfile inrocketmq-doc
. However, the subsequent installation step (lines 64-72) is configured withworking-directory: docs/
. Please verify if the Gemfile actually resides indocs/
or if this is a mismatch. Aligning these directories is critical to ensure that bundler correctly finds the Gemfile and related lock file.
64-72
:⚠️ Potential issueVerify Working Directory for Bundler Installation
The "Install Bundler Dependencies" step is set to run in
docs/
, which appears inconsistent with the caching configuration that references files inrocketmq-doc
. Confirm if the Gemfile and vendor bundle are located indocs/
or if the intended directory is actuallyrocketmq-doc
. If it's the latter, you might want to update the working directory accordingly. For instance:- working-directory: docs/ + working-directory: rocketmq-doc/✅ Verification successful
I'll start by gathering more details on where the Gemfile is located and whether the workflow is referencing "rocketmq-doc" anywhere. The following shell script checks for a Gemfile in both potential directories (i.e.,
docs/
androcketmq-doc/
) and searches for any reference to "rocketmq-doc" in the workflow file.
Working Directory Updated to RocketMQ-Doc
The shell script confirmed that the Gemfile is located in the
rocketmq-doc/
directory—there’s nodocs/
directory—and all caching configurations in the workflow correctly referencerocketmq-doc
. No further action is required.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash echo "Verifying Gemfile locations and caching references..." echo "Checking in 'docs/' directory:" if [ -d "docs" ]; then echo " - 'docs/' directory exists." if [ -f "docs/Gemfile" ]; then echo " - Found Gemfile in 'docs/'." else echo " - Gemfile not found in 'docs/'." fi else echo " - 'docs/' directory does not exist." fi echo "" echo "Checking in 'rocketmq-doc/' directory:" if [ -d "rocketmq-doc" ]; then echo " - 'rocketmq-doc/' directory exists." if [ -f "rocketmq-doc/Gemfile" ]; then echo " - Found Gemfile in 'rocketmq-doc/'." else echo " - Gemfile not found in 'rocketmq-doc/'." fi else echo " - 'rocketmq-doc/' directory does not exist." fi echo "" echo "Searching for caching configuration references to 'rocketmq-doc' in the workflow file:" rg -n "rocketmq-doc" .github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml || echo " - No references to 'rocketmq-doc' found in the workflow."Length of output: 1268
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2486 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 28.62% 28.62%
=======================================
Files 510 510
Lines 73518 73518
=======================================
Hits 21044 21044
Misses 52474 52474 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #issue_id
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit