AFNetworking 2.0 support

[iandundas]

Any plans for this?

Edit: on closer inspection it looks like MMRecord be used with anything, which is good. I guess the example code just needs to be updated. (I might have a go at one once I've worked it all out).

[cnstoll]

You're correct Ian. The idea is that MMRecord will support anything, but to date there isn't really a good example of using AF 2.0.

There is an MMRecord extension that you can use with AF 2.0. Its a custom MMRecord AFResponseSerializer that will return MMRecord instances in your AF success block. There's an article about that here:

http://mutualmobile.github.io/blog/2014/01/14/afnetworking-response-serialization-with-mmrecord-1-dot-2/

I do think we need to have a sample MMServer subclass that implements AF 2.0. But I'm on the fence about whether to replace the existing one with that, or to add a new one. We still use AF 1.0 on some of our projects internally, and I get the feeling that we're not alone in that. But we're also moving to AF 2.0 for new ones, as I expect many people are as well :)

If you want to take a stab at this as an extension, feel free. I love having people contribute to this. This is on my radar to add too, but if you want to do it that would be great.

Thanks,

• Conrad

[cnstoll]

I went ahead and started this. Do you want to take a look and let me know what you think?

https://github.com/mutualmobile/MMRecord/tree/cnstoll_AF2.0Example

Thanks,

• Conrad

[cnstoll]

Created a pull request:

#43