Skip to content

Conversation

@drewnoakes
Copy link
Contributor

This is my attempt to close the issue I opened (#91) regarding this feature.

Supported types are:

  • IReadOnlyDictionary<,>
  • IReadOnlyCollection<>
  • IReadOnlyList<>

…oses msgpack#91.

- IReadOnlyDictionary<,>
- IReadOnlyCollection<>
- IReadOnlyList<>
yfakariya added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2015
PR #93 was perfect in terms of abstract type support itself.
But there are more considerations about custom types which only implements read only collection interfaces. It requires additional collection serializer hierarchy and additional kinds.
@drewnoakes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Wow, seems I only scratched the surface of what was required for this feature. Thanks for finishing this off. I'll read through your commit and learn some more about the code base.

@drewnoakes drewnoakes closed this Jul 20, 2015
@yfakariya
Copy link
Member

@drewnoakes Don't worry. I also forgot about them, NUnit found :) Thank you for your work!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants