Add task delegation examples and best practices

[mschultheiss83]

Summary

Add comprehensive documentation for effective task delegation using the @claude supervision model.

Includes:

• Best practices for writing delegation prompts
• Template for effective specifications
• Analysis of prompts for Issues Task #2: Scaling & Load Testing - 10K+ Contexts #15 and Task #3: Search Improvement - Full-Text or Semantic #16
• Quality checklist for prompts
• Examples from completed Issue Task #1: Integration Testing - Real IDE Verification #14

Files Added

• docs/TASK_DELEGATION_EXAMPLES.md (326 lines)
  • Task delegation workflow explained
  • Prompt quality analysis
  • Examples from current issues
  • Best practices template

Current Status

Completed Tasks:

• Issue Task #1: Integration Testing - Real IDE Verification #14 - Integration Testing ✅

Ready to Delegate (Detailed Prompts Added):

• Issue Task #2: Scaling & Load Testing - 10K+ Contexts #15 - Load Testing & Scaling
• Issue Task #3: Search Improvement - Full-Text or Semantic #16 - Full-Text Search

Both issues have comprehensive @claude prompts in issue comments ready for implementation.

---

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[claude]

Pull Request Review: Task Delegation Examples Documentation

Summary

This PR adds comprehensive documentation for the Claude supervision model with task delegation examples. The document provides valuable guidance for effective prompt engineering and task delegation workflows.

---

✅ Strengths

1. Excellent Structure and Organization

• Clear hierarchical organization with logical flow
• Well-defined sections (Overview → Examples → Analysis → Workflow → Best Practices)
• Good use of markdown formatting for readability
• Consistent heading structure throughout

2. Practical Examples

• Concrete examples from Issues Task #2: Scaling & Load Testing - 10K+ Contexts #15 and Task #3: Search Improvement - Full-Text or Semantic #16 provide real-world context
• Good/bad prompt comparisons help illustrate best practices (lines 103-147)
• Template provided for reusable delegation prompts (lines 195-222)
• Step-by-step workflow from issue creation to merge (lines 151-188)

3. Comprehensive Coverage

• Covers prompt quality analysis with specific criteria
• Includes acceptance criteria checklist
• Documents lessons learned section
• Provides troubleshooting guidance

4. Alignment with Project Standards

• Follows CONTRIBUTING.md documentation guidelines
• Consistent with existing docs/ structure
• Uses same formatting conventions as INTEGRATION_TESTING_GUIDE.md
• Properly references related documentation (CLAUDE_SUPERVISION_WORKFLOW.md)

---

📝 Observations & Suggestions

1. Minor Inconsistency: Timeline Estimates

Location: Lines 45, 95, 318

The document mentions 'Time to implement: ~1-2 hours' and later states 'Could include timeline estimates (though we avoid timelines)'.

Suggestion: Consider removing specific time estimates or adding a disclaimer that these are rough guidelines, not commitments.

2. Potential Confusion: Status of Issues

Location: Lines 251-267

The document states Issue #14 is 'Completed' but when checking the actual issue status, it shows as OPEN.

Recommendation: Verify the actual completion status of referenced issues.

3. Missing References

Location: Lines 15-37 (Issue #15 details)

The document references '~500 lines' of prompt content but doesn't include the actual prompts or links to where they can be found.

Suggestion: Add direct links to issue comments or include abbreviated versions of the actual prompts.

---

🔍 Detailed Analysis

Code Quality & Best Practices

Rating: ✅ Excellent

• Proper markdown syntax and formatting
• Follows project conventions
• Clear structure and naming

Documentation Quality

Rating: ✅ Strong

• Clear and actionable instructions
• Comprehensive coverage
• Sufficient examples
• Easy to maintain

Potential Issues

Rating: ⚠️ Minor concerns only

1. Document may become outdated if issue statuses change
2. Assumes GitHub Actions workflow is fully implemented

Performance Considerations

Rating: ✅ Not Applicable (Documentation only)

Security Concerns

Rating: ✅ None Identified

---

✅ Final Assessment

Overall Quality: Strong Approval

This PR adds valuable documentation that will significantly improve the task delegation workflow.

Recommended Action: Approve with Minor Suggestions

The minor issues identified are not blockers and can be addressed in follow-up PRs if desired.

Specific Strengths:

1. Clear, actionable guidance
2. Real-world examples from the project
3. Comprehensive coverage of the delegation workflow
4. Excellent template for future use

Suggested Follow-ups (Optional):

1. Verify and update issue statuses
2. Consider removing or clarifying timeline estimates
3. Add links to actual prompt examples

---

🎉 Conclusion

This is an excellent addition to the project documentation. The task delegation examples will help maintain consistency in prompt quality and improve the effectiveness of the Claude supervision model.

Recommendation: MERGE ✅

Great work on documenting these patterns!

---

Review conducted following CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines and project documentation standards.