Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

replace Holding.rule_valid with Rule.absent #64

Open
mscarey opened this issue Oct 7, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

replace Holding.rule_valid with Rule.absent #64

mscarey opened this issue Oct 7, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@mscarey
Copy link
Owner

mscarey commented Oct 7, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Seems more consistent with the interface of Factor subclasses. Surprising if I never considered it before. See #26, which moved rule_valid from Rule to Holding.

Will require changing Holding.negated and related code in Holding implication and contradiction methods.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mscarey