Skip to content

Conversation

@mxinden
Copy link
Member

@mxinden mxinden commented Nov 26, 2025

work-in-progress

Fixes #1373.

@mxinden mxinden changed the title fix(transport/quic-datagram): do not enforce inbound queue limit fix(transport/quic-datagram): remove inbound queue limit Nov 26, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 26, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.42%. Comparing base (ab7ae57) to head (2f630b3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3171      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.50%   93.42%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         125      125              
  Lines       36637    36569      -68     
  Branches    36637    36569      -68     
==========================================
- Hits        34256    34165      -91     
- Misses       1529     1554      +25     
+ Partials      852      850       -2     
Components Coverage Δ
neqo-common 97.40% <ø> (ø)
neqo-crypto 83.19% <ø> (-0.49%) ⬇️
neqo-http3 93.26% <100.00%> (ø)
neqo-qpack 94.40% <ø> (ø)
neqo-transport 94.52% <100.00%> (-0.10%) ⬇️
neqo-udp 79.42% <ø> (ø)
mtu 85.44% <ø> (ø)

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Nov 26, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #3171 will degrade performances by 4.82%

Comparing mxinden:inbound-quic-datagram-limit (f561848) with main (340f4f1)

Summary

⚡ 2 improvements
❌ 2 regressions
✅ 19 untouched

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
Simulation client 903.9 ms 826.9 ms +9.31%
Simulation client 864.6 ms 694.8 ms +24.44%
Simulation decode 4096 bytes, mask ff 17.8 µs 18.4 µs -3.15%
Simulation run 163.4 ms 171.7 ms -4.82%

mxinden added a commit to mxinden/firefox that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2025
mxinden added a commit to mxinden/firefox that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2025
mxinden added a commit to mxinden/firefox that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2025
mxinden added a commit to mxinden/firefox that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2025
mxinden added a commit to mxinden/firefox that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2025
mxinden added a commit to mxinden/firefox that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2025
mxinden added a commit to mxinden/firefox that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Failed Interop Tests

QUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server, differences relative to main at ab7ae57.

neqo-pr as clientneqo-pr as server
neqo-pr vs. aioquic: A 🚀C1
neqo-pr vs. go-x-net: A BP BA
neqo-pr vs. haproxy: A ⚠️L1 C1 BP BA
neqo-pr vs. kwik: ⚠️L1 BP BA
neqo-pr vs. linuxquic: A ⚠️L1 C1
neqo-pr vs. lsquic: L1 C1
neqo-pr vs. msquic: A L1 C1
neqo-pr vs. mvfst: A 🚀L1 C1 BA
neqo-pr vs. nginx: A 🚀C1 BP BA
neqo-pr vs. ngtcp2: A L1 ⚠️C1 CM
neqo-pr vs. picoquic: A ⚠️C1
neqo-pr vs. quic-go: A ⚠️L1 C1
neqo-pr vs. quiche: A C1 BP BA
neqo-pr vs. quinn: A L1 ⚠️C1
neqo-pr vs. s2n-quic: A 🚀BP ⚠️L1 BA CM
neqo-pr vs. tquic: S A ⚠️L1 BP BA
neqo-pr vs. xquic: A L1
aioquic vs. neqo-pr: ⚠️C1 CM
go-x-net vs. neqo-pr: CM
kwik vs. neqo-pr: BP BA CM
msquic vs. neqo-pr: CM
mvfst vs. neqo-pr: Z A L1 C1 CM
ngtcp2 vs. neqo-pr: ⚠️L1
openssl vs. neqo-pr: LR M A CM
quic-go vs. neqo-pr: ⚠️BP CM
quiche vs. neqo-pr: CM
quinn vs. neqo-pr: V2 CM
s2n-quic vs. neqo-pr: CM
tquic vs. neqo-pr: CM
xquic vs. neqo-pr: M CM
All results

Succeeded Interop Tests

QUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server

neqo-pr as client

neqo-pr as server

Unsupported Interop Tests

QUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server

neqo-pr as client

neqo-pr as server

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Client/server transfer results

Performance differences relative to ab7ae57.

Transfer of 33554432 bytes over loopback, min. 100 runs. All unit-less numbers are in milliseconds.

Client vs. server (params) Mean ± σ Min Max MiB/s ± σ Δ main Δ main
neqo-s2n-cubic 218.9 ± 4.5 212.6 232.5 146.2 ± 7.1 💚 -2.1 -1.0%

Table above only shows statistically significant changes. See all results below.

All results

Transfer of 33554432 bytes over loopback, min. 100 runs. All unit-less numbers are in milliseconds.

Client vs. server (params) Mean ± σ Min Max MiB/s ± σ Δ main Δ main
google-google-nopacing 445.9 ± 4.1 439.8 459.5 71.8 ± 7.8
google-neqo-cubic 272.9 ± 4.2 264.8 281.7 117.2 ± 7.6 -0.9 -0.3%
msquic-msquic-nopacing 198.0 ± 71.3 135.2 396.0 161.6 ± 0.4
msquic-neqo-cubic 202.7 ± 45.0 149.8 385.9 157.8 ± 0.7 -16.2 -7.4%
neqo-google-cubic 743.2 ± 4.5 735.6 757.6 43.1 ± 7.1 0.7 0.1%
neqo-msquic-cubic 159.7 ± 4.3 153.2 167.7 200.3 ± 7.4 -0.9 -0.6%
neqo-neqo-cubic 97.2 ± 4.2 88.7 105.7 329.3 ± 7.6 -0.4 -0.4%
neqo-neqo-cubic-nopacing 96.4 ± 4.8 88.0 106.6 331.9 ± 6.7 0.8 0.9%
neqo-neqo-reno 97.5 ± 4.5 89.0 107.3 328.2 ± 7.1 -0.5 -0.6%
neqo-neqo-reno-nopacing 96.8 ± 4.5 89.7 113.8 330.7 ± 7.1 1.1 1.1%
neqo-quiche-cubic 191.8 ± 3.8 185.3 202.4 166.9 ± 8.4 0.7 0.3%
neqo-s2n-cubic 218.9 ± 4.5 212.6 232.5 146.2 ± 7.1 💚 -2.1 -1.0%
quiche-neqo-cubic 153.2 ± 4.3 139.2 162.7 208.9 ± 7.4 0.9 0.6%
quiche-quiche-nopacing 144.9 ± 6.0 137.4 181.9 220.9 ± 5.3
s2n-neqo-cubic 172.8 ± 5.2 162.9 186.5 185.1 ± 6.2 -0.9 -0.5%
s2n-s2n-nopacing 250.9 ± 27.9 231.2 346.8 127.5 ± 1.1

Download data for profiler.firefox.com or download performance comparison data.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

Significant performance differences relative to ab7ae57.

1-conn/1-100mb-req/mtu-1504 (aka. Upload)/client: 💔 Performance has regressed by +1.3372%.
       time:   [212.53 ms 212.96 ms 213.45 ms]
       thrpt:  [468.48 MiB/s 469.58 MiB/s 470.53 MiB/s]
change:
       time:   [+1.0504% +1.3372% +1.6423] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
       thrpt:  [-1.6158% -1.3195% -1.0395]
       Performance has regressed.
Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
2 (2.00%) high severe
1000-streams/each-1-bytes/wallclock-time: 💚 Performance has improved by -1.6141%.
       time:   [12.196 ms 12.242 ms 12.295 ms]
       change: [-2.1259% -1.6141% -1.0853] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
       Performance has improved.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) high severe
transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds/wallclock-time/run: 💚 Performance has improved by -3.1984%.
       time:   [22.952 ms 22.977 ms 23.006 ms]
       change: [-3.3335% -3.1984% -3.0583] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
       Performance has improved.
Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
All results
1-conn/1-100mb-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. Download)/client: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [203.31 ms 203.77 ms 204.28 ms]
       thrpt:  [489.52 MiB/s 490.76 MiB/s 491.86 MiB/s]
change:
       time:   [+0.0345% +0.4390% +0.8298] (p = 0.03 < 0.05)
       thrpt:  [-0.8229% -0.4371% -0.0345]
       Change within noise threshold.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) high severe
1-conn/10_000-parallel-1b-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. RPS)/client: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [283.73 ms 285.59 ms 287.48 ms]
       thrpt:  [34.784 Kelem/s 35.015 Kelem/s 35.245 Kelem/s]
change:
       time:   [+0.4864% +1.3732% +2.2942] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
       thrpt:  [-2.2428% -1.3546% -0.4841]
       Change within noise threshold.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
1-conn/1-1b-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. HPS)/client: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [38.619 ms 38.764 ms 38.927 ms]
       thrpt:  [25.689   B/s 25.797   B/s 25.894   B/s]
change:
       time:   [+0.0351% +0.5389% +1.0404] (p = 0.04 < 0.05)
       thrpt:  [-1.0297% -0.5360% -0.0351]
       Change within noise threshold.
Found 10 outliers among 100 measurements (10.00%)
1 (1.00%) low mild
4 (4.00%) high mild
5 (5.00%) high severe
1-conn/1-100mb-req/mtu-1504 (aka. Upload)/client: 💔 Performance has regressed by +1.3372%.
       time:   [212.53 ms 212.96 ms 213.45 ms]
       thrpt:  [468.48 MiB/s 469.58 MiB/s 470.53 MiB/s]
change:
       time:   [+1.0504% +1.3372% +1.6423] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
       thrpt:  [-1.6158% -1.3195% -1.0395]
       Performance has regressed.
Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
2 (2.00%) high severe
decode 4096 bytes, mask ff: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [7.2251 µs 7.2368 µs 7.2490 µs]
       change: [-0.2462% -0.0128% +0.2211] (p = 0.92 > 0.05)
       No change in performance detected.
Found 8 outliers among 100 measurements (8.00%)
6 (6.00%) high mild
2 (2.00%) high severe
decode 1048576 bytes, mask ff: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [1.8419 ms 1.8501 ms 1.8641 ms]
       change: [-0.1492% +0.3455% +1.1861] (p = 0.41 > 0.05)
       No change in performance detected.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) high severe
decode 4096 bytes, mask 7f: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [10.158 µs 10.172 µs 10.186 µs]
       change: [-0.7303% -0.1121% +0.3540] (p = 0.73 > 0.05)
       No change in performance detected.
Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
decode 1048576 bytes, mask 7f: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [2.5962 ms 2.5997 ms 2.6032 ms]
       change: [-0.5268% -0.1883% +0.0887] (p = 0.25 > 0.05)
       No change in performance detected.
decode 4096 bytes, mask 3f: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [12.459 µs 12.480 µs 12.502 µs]
       change: [-1.1796% -0.5284% +0.1379] (p = 0.12 > 0.05)
       No change in performance detected.
Found 5 outliers among 100 measurements (5.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild
3 (3.00%) high severe
decode 1048576 bytes, mask 3f: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [3.1953 ms 3.2004 ms 3.2057 ms]
       change: [-0.0814% +0.1294% +0.3590] (p = 0.27 > 0.05)
       No change in performance detected.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
1-streams/each-1000-bytes/wallclock-time: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [581.95 µs 584.66 µs 587.81 µs]
       change: [-1.0546% -0.4673% +0.1810] (p = 0.14 > 0.05)
       No change in performance detected.
Found 10 outliers among 100 measurements (10.00%)
10 (10.00%) high severe
1-streams/each-1000-bytes/simulated-time: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [118.95 ms 119.20 ms 119.45 ms]
       thrpt:  [8.1754 KiB/s 8.1926 KiB/s 8.2096 KiB/s]
change:
       time:   [-0.0791% +0.2174% +0.4635] (p = 0.12 > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [-0.4613% -0.2169% +0.0792]
       No change in performance detected.
1000-streams/each-1-bytes/wallclock-time: 💚 Performance has improved by -1.6141%.
       time:   [12.196 ms 12.242 ms 12.295 ms]
       change: [-2.1259% -1.6141% -1.0853] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
       Performance has improved.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
1 (1.00%) high severe
1000-streams/each-1-bytes/simulated-time: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [2.3283 s 2.3323 s 2.3363 s]
       thrpt:  [428.03   B/s 428.77   B/s 429.50   B/s]
change:
       time:   [-0.2209% +0.0108% +0.2367] (p = 0.93 > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [-0.2362% -0.0108% +0.2214]
       No change in performance detected.
1000-streams/each-1000-bytes/wallclock-time: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [50.121 ms 50.235 ms 50.348 ms]
       change: [-0.6825% -0.2186% +0.1864] (p = 0.35 > 0.05)
       No change in performance detected.
1000-streams/each-1000-bytes/simulated-time: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [16.185 s 16.416 s 16.649 s]
       thrpt:  [58.656 KiB/s 59.488 KiB/s 60.338 KiB/s]
change:
       time:   [-1.5841% +0.6530% +2.8357] (p = 0.56 > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [-2.7575% -0.6488% +1.6096]
       No change in performance detected.
Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
1 (1.00%) low mild
1 (1.00%) high mild
coalesce_acked_from_zero 1+1 entries: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [89.692 ns 89.976 ns 90.256 ns]
       change: [-0.6343% -0.1417% +0.3858] (p = 0.60 > 0.05)
       No change in performance detected.
Found 10 outliers among 100 measurements (10.00%)
7 (7.00%) high mild
3 (3.00%) high severe
coalesce_acked_from_zero 3+1 entries: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [106.81 ns 107.16 ns 107.54 ns]
       change: [-0.6158% -0.1928% +0.2883] (p = 0.40 > 0.05)
       No change in performance detected.
Found 13 outliers among 100 measurements (13.00%)
1 (1.00%) low mild
1 (1.00%) high mild
11 (11.00%) high severe
coalesce_acked_from_zero 10+1 entries: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [106.15 ns 106.43 ns 106.81 ns]
       change: [-2.1449% -0.9234% -0.0662] (p = 0.07 > 0.05)
       No change in performance detected.
Found 15 outliers among 100 measurements (15.00%)
5 (5.00%) low severe
2 (2.00%) low mild
3 (3.00%) high mild
5 (5.00%) high severe
coalesce_acked_from_zero 1000+1 entries: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [92.562 ns 92.713 ns 92.875 ns]
       change: [-7.0759% -2.4412% +0.3208] (p = 0.35 > 0.05)
       No change in performance detected.
Found 9 outliers among 100 measurements (9.00%)
4 (4.00%) high mild
5 (5.00%) high severe
RxStreamOrderer::inbound_frame(): Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [108.18 ms 108.38 ms 108.70 ms]
       change: [-1.0775% -0.8795% -0.5788] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
       Change within noise threshold.
Found 12 outliers among 100 measurements (12.00%)
8 (8.00%) low mild
2 (2.00%) high mild
2 (2.00%) high severe
sent::Packets::take_ranges: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [4.4499 µs 4.5330 µs 4.6030 µs]
       change: [-2.5851% +1.6090% +6.7042] (p = 0.55 > 0.05)
       No change in performance detected.
Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds/wallclock-time/run: 💚 Performance has improved by -3.1984%.
       time:   [22.952 ms 22.977 ms 23.006 ms]
       change: [-3.3335% -3.1984% -3.0583] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
       Performance has improved.
Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds/simulated-time/run: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [23.941 s 23.941 s 23.941 s]
       thrpt:  [171.09 KiB/s 171.09 KiB/s 171.09 KiB/s]
change:
       time:   [+0.0000% +0.0000% +0.0000] (p = NaN > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [+0.0000% +0.0000% +0.0000]
       No change in performance detected.
transfer/pacing-true/varying-seeds/wallclock-time/run: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [23.694 ms 23.721 ms 23.758 ms]
       change: [-2.1044% -1.8414% -1.6137] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
       Change within noise threshold.
Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild
1 (1.00%) high severe
transfer/pacing-true/varying-seeds/simulated-time/run: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [23.676 s 23.676 s 23.676 s]
       thrpt:  [173.01 KiB/s 173.01 KiB/s 173.01 KiB/s]
change:
       time:   [+0.0000% +0.0000% +0.0000] (p = NaN > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [+0.0000% +0.0000% +0.0000]
       No change in performance detected.
transfer/pacing-false/same-seed/wallclock-time/run: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [23.370 ms 23.389 ms 23.408 ms]
       change: [-2.3429% -2.1256% -1.9583] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
       Change within noise threshold.
transfer/pacing-false/same-seed/simulated-time/run: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [23.941 s 23.941 s 23.941 s]
       thrpt:  [171.09 KiB/s 171.09 KiB/s 171.09 KiB/s]
change:
       time:   [+0.0000% +0.0000% +0.0000] (p = NaN > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [+0.0000% +0.0000% +0.0000]
       No change in performance detected.
transfer/pacing-true/same-seed/wallclock-time/run: Change within noise threshold.
       time:   [23.876 ms 23.893 ms 23.910 ms]
       change: [-1.4229% -1.2825% -1.1555] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
       Change within noise threshold.
Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
3 (3.00%) high mild
transfer/pacing-true/same-seed/simulated-time/run: No change in performance detected.
       time:   [23.676 s 23.676 s 23.676 s]
       thrpt:  [173.01 KiB/s 173.01 KiB/s 173.01 KiB/s]
change:
       time:   [+0.0000% +0.0000% +0.0000] (p = NaN > 0.05)
       thrpt:  [+0.0000% +0.0000% +0.0000]
       No change in performance detected.

Download data for profiler.firefox.com or download performance comparison data.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchinbound-quic-datagram-limit
TestbedOn-prem

🚨 2 Alerts

BenchmarkMeasure
Units
ViewBenchmark Result
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
(Limit %)
decode 1048576 bytes, mask 3fLatency
milliseconds (ms)
📈 plot
🚷 threshold
🚨 alert (🔔)
3.20 ms
(+81.04%)Baseline: 1.77 ms
2.57 ms
(124.60%)

decode 4096 bytes, mask 3fLatency
microseconds (µs)
📈 plot
🚷 threshold
🚨 alert (🔔)
12.48 µs
(+70.47%)Baseline: 7.32 µs
11.17 µs
(111.76%)

Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
nanoseconds (ns)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
nanoseconds (ns)
(Limit %)
1-conn/1-100mb-req/mtu-1504 (aka. Upload)/client📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
212,960,000.00 ns
(+2.50%)Baseline: 207,773,021.98 ns
216,920,610.34 ns
(98.17%)
1-conn/1-100mb-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. Download)/client📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
203,770,000.00 ns
(+0.87%)Baseline: 202,006,300.37 ns
211,672,638.21 ns
(96.27%)
1-conn/1-1b-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. HPS)/client📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
38,764,000.00 ns
(+13.21%)Baseline: 34,240,582.42 ns
46,159,734.53 ns
(83.98%)
1-conn/10_000-parallel-1b-resp/mtu-1504 (aka. RPS)/client📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
285,590,000.00 ns
(-1.13%)Baseline: 288,840,384.62 ns
302,066,672.75 ns
(94.55%)
1-streams/each-1000-bytes/simulated-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
119,200,000.00 ns
(+0.32%)Baseline: 118,821,153.85 ns
120,506,854.42 ns
(98.92%)
1-streams/each-1000-bytes/wallclock-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
584,660.00 ns
(-0.87%)Baseline: 589,783.33 ns
610,375.27 ns
(95.79%)
1000-streams/each-1-bytes/simulated-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
2,332,300,000.00 ns
(-75.14%)Baseline: 9,383,336,263.74 ns
24,060,513,708.12 ns
(9.69%)
1000-streams/each-1-bytes/wallclock-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
12,242,000.00 ns
(-8.25%)Baseline: 13,342,338.83 ns
15,170,062.47 ns
(80.70%)
1000-streams/each-1000-bytes/simulated-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
16,416,000,000.00 ns
(-7.83%)Baseline: 17,810,311,355.31 ns
20,841,225,915.96 ns
(78.77%)
1000-streams/each-1000-bytes/wallclock-time📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
50,235,000.00 ns
(-0.54%)Baseline: 50,509,269.23 ns
55,680,153.38 ns
(90.22%)
RxStreamOrderer::inbound_frame()📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
108,380,000.00 ns
(-1.23%)Baseline: 109,733,827.84 ns
111,383,712.61 ns
(97.30%)
coalesce_acked_from_zero 1+1 entries📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
89.98 ns
(+0.96%)Baseline: 89.12 ns
90.42 ns
(99.51%)
coalesce_acked_from_zero 10+1 entries📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
106.43 ns
(+0.37%)Baseline: 106.04 ns
107.11 ns
(99.37%)
coalesce_acked_from_zero 1000+1 entries📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
92.71 ns
(+1.96%)Baseline: 90.93 ns
95.30 ns
(97.28%)
coalesce_acked_from_zero 3+1 entries📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
107.16 ns
(+0.59%)Baseline: 106.53 ns
107.53 ns
(99.66%)
decode 1048576 bytes, mask 3f📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
🚨 view alert (🔔)
3,200,400.00 ns
(+81.04%)Baseline: 1,767,788.64 ns
2,568,516.93 ns
(124.60%)

decode 1048576 bytes, mask 7f📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
2,599,700.00 ns
(-46.74%)Baseline: 4,880,893.04 ns
6,409,099.69 ns
(40.56%)
decode 1048576 bytes, mask ff📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1,850,100.00 ns
(-36.98%)Baseline: 2,935,773.08 ns
3,664,949.49 ns
(50.48%)
decode 4096 bytes, mask 3f📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
🚨 view alert (🔔)
12,480.00 ns
(+70.47%)Baseline: 7,320.73 ns
11,167.11 ns
(111.76%)

decode 4096 bytes, mask 7f📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
10,172.00 ns
(-46.61%)Baseline: 19,053.05 ns
25,022.93 ns
(40.65%)
decode 4096 bytes, mask ff📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
7,236.80 ns
(-34.58%)Baseline: 11,061.45 ns
13,800.04 ns
(52.44%)
sent::Packets::take_ranges📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
4,533.00 ns
(-3.20%)Baseline: 4,682.73 ns
4,923.68 ns
(92.07%)
transfer/pacing-false/same-seed/simulated-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
23,941,000,000.00 ns
(-5.20%)Baseline: 25,254,777,573.53 ns
26,245,080,433.05 ns
(91.22%)
transfer/pacing-false/same-seed/wallclock-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
23,389,000.00 ns
(-7.53%)Baseline: 25,294,108.46 ns
27,100,543.84 ns
(86.30%)
transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds/simulated-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
23,941,000,000.00 ns
(-4.60%)Baseline: 25,094,375,000.00 ns
25,833,547,044.15 ns
(92.67%)
transfer/pacing-false/varying-seeds/wallclock-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
22,977,000.00 ns
(-9.66%)Baseline: 25,433,001.84 ns
27,350,082.24 ns
(84.01%)
transfer/pacing-true/same-seed/simulated-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
23,676,000,000.00 ns
(-6.43%)Baseline: 25,302,330,882.35 ns
26,484,963,507.63 ns
(89.39%)
transfer/pacing-true/same-seed/wallclock-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
23,893,000.00 ns
(-9.65%)Baseline: 26,444,016.54 ns
28,876,616.50 ns
(82.74%)
transfer/pacing-true/varying-seeds/simulated-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
23,676,000,000.00 ns
(-4.92%)Baseline: 24,901,911,764.71 ns
25,688,193,989.38 ns
(92.17%)
transfer/pacing-true/varying-seeds/wallclock-time/run📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
23,721,000.00 ns
(-8.52%)Baseline: 25,931,044.12 ns
27,939,869.57 ns
(84.90%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make sure to buffer all Datagrams that are received in a single UDP datagram

2 participants