Skip to content

Conversation

@DylanYoung
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #182

@stevejalim
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the clarification, @DylanYoung - it's appreciated!

What you've added makes sense when one reads the context of the related issue, but I'd like to suggest an extension of it for extra-extra clarity

Copy link
Contributor

@stevejalim stevejalim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, though have added an extra bit of clarification

Co-authored-by: Steve Jalim <steve@stevejalim.net>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CSP_INCLUDE_NONCE_IN not working?

3 participants