Skip to content

Test redis direct connection, fallback to docker if failed #91

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

husaynirfan1
Copy link
Contributor

@husaynirfan1 husaynirfan1 commented Apr 17, 2025

It first tries to connect directly to redis and only falls back to using Docker if that fails.

Copy link

prophet-code-review-bot bot commented Apr 17, 2025

Error: Agent timed out after 12 minutes of thinking

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to dcbc8d1 in 1 minute and 58 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 37 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 5 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. start_server.py:80
  • Draft comment:
    After starting the container, consider waiting for Redis to be available to avoid race conditions.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
2. start_server.py:327
  • Draft comment:
    Add a newline at end of file to meet POSIX standards.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
    While having a newline at end of file is indeed a POSIX standard, this is a very minor issue that would typically be handled automatically by IDE settings or git configurations. It doesn't affect functionality. Most importantly, this kind of formatting issue would typically be caught by linters or formatters in the CI pipeline.
    The comment is technically correct - POSIX does require newlines at end of files. And it is pointing out an actual change in the diff.
    While technically correct, this is exactly the kind of minor formatting issue that should be handled by automated tools rather than manual review comments. It falls under the rule about not commenting on obvious things that would be caught by the build.
    We should delete this comment. This kind of minor formatting issue should be handled by automated tools rather than cluttering PR reviews.
3. start_server.py:46
  • Draft comment:
    Good update to the docstring and fallback behavior. Consider parameterizing 'redis_host' and 'redis_port' rather than hardcoding 'localhost' and 6379 for flexibility.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
    None
4. start_server.py:66
  • Draft comment:
    After starting the Docker container, consider waiting or re-checking for Redis availability to avoid race conditions if the service takes time to start.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
    None
5. start_server.py:327
  • Draft comment:
    Please add a newline at the end of the file for POSIX compliance.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50%
    None

Workflow ID: wflow_BFtt84nSWQkIHZfG


Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mrge found 1 issue across 1 file. View it in mrge.io

start_server.py Outdated
@@ -44,7 +44,16 @@ def wait_for_redis(host="localhost", port=6379, timeout=20):
return False

def check_and_start_redis():
"""Check if the Redis container is running, start if necessary."""
"""Check if the Redis service is available (via Docker or directly), and start the Docker container if necessary."""
redis_host = "localhost" # or use any custom host if required
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hardcoded redis_host value does not use environment variables or settings that are used elsewhere in the codebase.

Changed to use env var

Co-authored-by: ellipsis-dev[bot] <65095814+ellipsis-dev[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

prophet-code-review-bot bot commented Apr 17, 2025

Bug Report

Name Severity Example test case Description
Redis Port Mismatch Medium Set the REDIS_PORT environment variable to 6380 and run the application. The check_and_start_redis function uses the REDIS_PORT environment variable to determine the port to connect to Redis. However, when starting the Redis Docker container, it always exposes port 6379, regardless of the value of REDIS_PORT. This mismatch can lead to connection failures if REDIS_PORT is set to a value other than 6379.

Copy link

prophet-code-review-bot bot commented Apr 18, 2025

Bug Report

Name Severity Example test case Description
Missing ValueError handling for REDIS_PORT Medium Set REDIS_PORT to a non-integer value (e.g., 'abc') The application crashes if the REDIS_PORT environment variable is set to a non-integer value because the code doesn't handle the ValueError raised by int().
Missing Exception handling for Docker commands Medium Introduce an invalid docker command (e.g., docker "invalid_command") The application can crash if the docker commands fail (e.g., docker daemon not running, incorrect docker command syntax). The code should handle these exceptions gracefully, log the error, and potentially suggest solutions to the user.

Copy link

prophet-code-review-bot bot commented Apr 18, 2025

An error occurred.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Apr 18, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants