Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[POC] Stringview #987

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

[POC] Stringview #987

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

qazxcdswe123
Copy link
Contributor

@qazxcdswe123 qazxcdswe123 commented Sep 12, 2024

The main idea is to eliminate the cost of constructing an Array from String then ArrayView it.

However, this implementation lacks some important property, like

match view {
  ['-', '>', .. as rest] => ...
}

Which is extensively used in minimoonbit's implementation. This is not ideal, and the compiler should be able to handle this case

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 12, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Based on the provided git diff output, here are three potential issues or suggestions for improvement in the MoonBit code:

  1. Repeated Test Cases:

    • File: builtin/stringview_test.mbt
    • Issue: There are several repeated test cases with the same name. For example, panic string_as_view_start_index_error, panic string_as_view_end_index_error, and panic string_as_view_length_index_error are each repeated twice.
    • Suggestion: Remove the duplicate test cases to avoid redundancy and potential confusion. Each test case should have a unique name to clearly identify its purpose.
  2. Error Handling in guard Statements:

    • File: builtin/stringview.mbt
    • Issue: The guard statements use abort for error handling, which might not be the most graceful way to handle errors.
    • Suggestion: Consider using a more controlled error handling mechanism, such as raising an error or returning an error type. This would allow for better error propagation and handling in a larger application.
  3. Use of |> ignore in Tests:

    • File: builtin/stringview_test.mbt
    • Issue: The |> ignore operator is used in several test cases to ignore the result of an expression that is expected to cause a panic.
    • Suggestion: Instead of ignoring the result, consider using a try/catch block to explicitly handle the expected error, which can provide more clarity and ensure that the test case is properly verifying the error condition.

These observations are based on the provided code snippets and the context of MoonBit programming language. They aim to enhance code clarity, maintainability, and error handling practices.

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3106

Details

  • 13 of 13 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.09%) to 83.493%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 3103: 0.09%
Covered Lines: 3930
Relevant Lines: 4707

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants